The macular is the central part of the retina and is the area where the fine detail of sight is formed so it is very important. Sometimes the macular degenerates blurred vision occurs. This is often the first sign that something is wrong with the eye. Distorted vision is also a symptom and if either of these conditions occur you should visit your nearest doctor as soon as possible. The condition can be treated, but like all illnesses, the quicker it can be caught the better. If left completely untreated macular degeneration can lead to blindness.
It isn't completely accurate to refer to just one condition known as macular degeneration. In fact there is dry age related macular degeneration, and wet age related macular degeneration. Dry AMD develops very slowly and is caused by the light sensitive cells breaking down as described above. Wet AMD is much rarer and is more serious too as it is more likely to lead to complete blindness if not treated.
This occurs when the blood vessels in the eye begin to grow at an abnormal rate. This growth forces the retina away from the eye wall and this detachment is extremely serious and will eventually lead to blindness. The signs of wet AMD are seeing straight lines as slightly curved and medical attention is vital immediately.
There are treatments available for both these conditions. Dry AMD is the much less serious condition of the two, and even making a few lifestyle changes can go some way to keeping the condition from worsening. Dry AMD occurs through the aging of the eye, so you can slow this down considerably by making your eyes more healthy and strong. This can be done through making healthy lifestyle changes and carrying out special eye exercises too. The condition can be slowed right down with simple changes to your everyday life such as these. Eating plenty of vegetables that are rich in vitamins and minerals is vital too.
If the condition is in the early stages then the eye doctor may well prescribe a course of injections with an anti-vascular endothelial growth drug. If the condition is too advanced or if these drugs do not help the problem then laser treatment may be able to stop the progression of the problem, although it cannot return vision that has been lost.
Eye surgery is quick and painless and the recovery period is short. That makes it a viable option for many people. Whilst the cost of such a treatment was extremely high many years ago, today the price is much more affordable. Because it is able to halt the growth of problems, it is extremely popular and has helped thousands of people across the UK. Regular check ups are absolutely vital if you want to catch any problems such as this early on.
There is a selection of macular degeneration treatment available and your eye doctor will prescribe that which is the most appropriate. Laser vision correction surgery is an effective way to restore sight and prevent the condition from worsening. Laser eye surgery can be used to treat other conditions too for example it is highly effective in cataracts surgery.
Showing posts with label treatment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label treatment. Show all posts
Friday, January 28, 2011
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Stargardt Macular Degeneration
By: Macular Degeneration In General
One of the more popular juvenile macular degeneration is the Stargardt Macular Degeneration. This category of macular degenerationi was first reported in 1901 by a German ophthalmologist, Karl Stargardt. It has the common feature of loss of central vision. In 1963, France ophthalmologist Adolphe Fransceschetti used the term Fundus flavimaculatus for a degenerative loss of central vision, but soon to be identified as Stargardt Macular Degeneration by Hadden and Gass in 1976.
This macular dystrophy affects about one in every 10,000 children. The problem may start anytime between the ages 6 and 20, but patients may not notice until they reach their 30s or 40s. First, the children may experience difficulty in reading, and complaining of some blind spots that are often gray, black or hazy at their central vision. They will need more time to adjust between the different lighting of the room too, between light and dark environments.
The dystrophy affects the retina, that sensitive tissue that lies at the back of the eye, focusing especially in the middle region called the macula. The macula is where focus is, that area that is highly sensitive and strong enough to give us the sharp central vision for tasks such as reading, driving and recognising faces.
Stargardt macular degeneration is similar to dry macular degeneration, with the build-up of abnormal yellow pigment substance called lipofuscin building up in cells underlying the macula. Patients will also experience problem with night vision, and it will be difficult for them to move around in places with low lighting. In some others, the patient may also experience colour impairment at advanced stages of the disease.
Vision loss is usually slow, until the 20/40 level. It may suddenly shoot right up to 20/200 where the patient is considered legally blind and forbidden from driving. In some cases, it may even deteriorate to 10/200 within a matter of months.
Genes are a big issue when it comes to Stargardt macular degeneration. A group of genes collectively known as the ABC genes, was found to be the culprit of this juvenile macular degeneration, a discovery made since 1997. The ABCA4 gene, responsible for the production of protein used as an energy transport to and from photoreceptor cells in the retina, mutates and produces dysfunctional protein that cannot perform such transport function. The useless ABCA4 protein then allows the accumulation of yellow, fatty material to accumulate in the retina, slowly covering the macularand ultimately causes the loss of vision. However, more studies had to be done to further understand how the mutated genes affect the biochemistry of the retina.
All is not lost for patients with Stargardt disease. It was found that patients may slow down the progression of vision loss by wearing UV protective sunglasses and avoid exposure to bright light. Although there is not yet any effective treatment for this form of macular degeneration at this moment, it is believed that the identification of the genes behind macular degeneration will help the search for new strategies and therapies. The latest is a study scheduled to begin in 2011, for the injection of embryonic stem cells into the eyes of twelve patients affected by the disease. The Advanced Cell Technology announced in November 2010 that the FDA had approved this injection and study.
Stargardt Macular Degeneration may be either autosomal or recessive trait type. A person may not have prior family history, but may have a recessive gene. If both parents carry a mutated gene, there is always a chance for the child to develop macular dystrophy. In fact, there may be more than one family member who gets Stargardt. For children who did not develop Stargardt, there is again the possibility of carrying the mutant gene, and pass on to their children instead. The chances will be 25%.
Three tests are used to check the presence of fundus flecks and the loss of cones to determine whether a patient has Stargardt Macular Degeneration. It may be fluorescein angiography, electroretinography or electrooculography. Since this problem is rare, it is not a widely studied subject. The discovery of genetic mutation in Stargardt may have encouraged the findings of genetic links for age-related macular degeneration, but further studies on the age-related macular degeneration may also become the contributing factor towards better understanding of Stargardt’s disease and its possible lead to new treatment. Whichever way it may be, it will always remain hopeful for parents and their affected children.
One of the more popular juvenile macular degeneration is the Stargardt Macular Degeneration. This category of macular degenerationi was first reported in 1901 by a German ophthalmologist, Karl Stargardt. It has the common feature of loss of central vision. In 1963, France ophthalmologist Adolphe Fransceschetti used the term Fundus flavimaculatus for a degenerative loss of central vision, but soon to be identified as Stargardt Macular Degeneration by Hadden and Gass in 1976.
This macular dystrophy affects about one in every 10,000 children. The problem may start anytime between the ages 6 and 20, but patients may not notice until they reach their 30s or 40s. First, the children may experience difficulty in reading, and complaining of some blind spots that are often gray, black or hazy at their central vision. They will need more time to adjust between the different lighting of the room too, between light and dark environments.
The dystrophy affects the retina, that sensitive tissue that lies at the back of the eye, focusing especially in the middle region called the macula. The macula is where focus is, that area that is highly sensitive and strong enough to give us the sharp central vision for tasks such as reading, driving and recognising faces.
Stargardt macular degeneration is similar to dry macular degeneration, with the build-up of abnormal yellow pigment substance called lipofuscin building up in cells underlying the macula. Patients will also experience problem with night vision, and it will be difficult for them to move around in places with low lighting. In some others, the patient may also experience colour impairment at advanced stages of the disease.
Vision loss is usually slow, until the 20/40 level. It may suddenly shoot right up to 20/200 where the patient is considered legally blind and forbidden from driving. In some cases, it may even deteriorate to 10/200 within a matter of months.
Genes are a big issue when it comes to Stargardt macular degeneration. A group of genes collectively known as the ABC genes, was found to be the culprit of this juvenile macular degeneration, a discovery made since 1997. The ABCA4 gene, responsible for the production of protein used as an energy transport to and from photoreceptor cells in the retina, mutates and produces dysfunctional protein that cannot perform such transport function. The useless ABCA4 protein then allows the accumulation of yellow, fatty material to accumulate in the retina, slowly covering the macularand ultimately causes the loss of vision. However, more studies had to be done to further understand how the mutated genes affect the biochemistry of the retina.
All is not lost for patients with Stargardt disease. It was found that patients may slow down the progression of vision loss by wearing UV protective sunglasses and avoid exposure to bright light. Although there is not yet any effective treatment for this form of macular degeneration at this moment, it is believed that the identification of the genes behind macular degeneration will help the search for new strategies and therapies. The latest is a study scheduled to begin in 2011, for the injection of embryonic stem cells into the eyes of twelve patients affected by the disease. The Advanced Cell Technology announced in November 2010 that the FDA had approved this injection and study.
Stargardt Macular Degeneration may be either autosomal or recessive trait type. A person may not have prior family history, but may have a recessive gene. If both parents carry a mutated gene, there is always a chance for the child to develop macular dystrophy. In fact, there may be more than one family member who gets Stargardt. For children who did not develop Stargardt, there is again the possibility of carrying the mutant gene, and pass on to their children instead. The chances will be 25%.
Three tests are used to check the presence of fundus flecks and the loss of cones to determine whether a patient has Stargardt Macular Degeneration. It may be fluorescein angiography, electroretinography or electrooculography. Since this problem is rare, it is not a widely studied subject. The discovery of genetic mutation in Stargardt may have encouraged the findings of genetic links for age-related macular degeneration, but further studies on the age-related macular degeneration may also become the contributing factor towards better understanding of Stargardt’s disease and its possible lead to new treatment. Whichever way it may be, it will always remain hopeful for parents and their affected children.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Can Eye Drops With Pirenoxine Be Used to Treat Cataracts?
by;Dr. Ari Weitzner
For over 60 years, cataracts has been treated in China with eye drops containing the non-prescription drug pirenoxine.
Researchers recently tested the potential effectiveness of pirenoxine as a treatment for cataracts by investigating whether and how pirenoxine interacts with selenite or calcium ions, which have been proven as factors leading to the formation of lens cataracts.
As reported in the journal Inorganic Chemistry, researchers found that pirenoxine reduced the cloudiness of the lens solution containing calcium by 38 per cent and reduced the cloudiness of the selenite solution by 11 per cent.
Researchers concluded that the results may provide a rationale for using pirenoxine as an anti-cataract agent and advocated further biological studies.
For over 60 years, cataracts has been treated in China with eye drops containing the non-prescription drug pirenoxine.
Researchers recently tested the potential effectiveness of pirenoxine as a treatment for cataracts by investigating whether and how pirenoxine interacts with selenite or calcium ions, which have been proven as factors leading to the formation of lens cataracts.
As reported in the journal Inorganic Chemistry, researchers found that pirenoxine reduced the cloudiness of the lens solution containing calcium by 38 per cent and reduced the cloudiness of the selenite solution by 11 per cent.
Researchers concluded that the results may provide a rationale for using pirenoxine as an anti-cataract agent and advocated further biological studies.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Novartis gains new indication for Lucentis in EU for vision loss due to Diabetic Macular Edema
By:Financial
The European Commission has granted Novartis a new indication for Lucentis (ranibizumab) to treat patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME), a leading cause of blindness in the working-age population in most developed countries.
Laser therapy, the current standard of care, has provided stabilization of vision in many patients, but generally does not improve vision. Lucentis is the first licensed therapy to significantly improve both vision and vision-related quality of life in patients with visual impairment due to DME.
"Similarly to wet age related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema can cause disabling vision loss. While vision loss as a consequence of diabetes affects only a very small proportion of people with the disease, it is one of the most feared complications," said Don Curran, Chair, AMD Alliance International. "Visual impairment impacts everything from managing social interactions to the ability to work - thus, for most people it means a loss of independence."
The approval of Lucentis was based on data from two Novartis-sponsored clinical trials, RESTORE and RESOLVE, which showed that Lucentis was superior in providing rapid and sustained visual acuity gain versus sham (dummy) therapy or laser therapy, the current standard of care.
"In the clinical trials, Lucentis-treated patients began to recover their vision as early as eight days after the first injection on average, and vision improvement was maintained at one year," said Gabriele E. Lang, Professor, University Eye Hospital, University of Ulm, Germany. "The vision improvement for many of these patients was clinically significant, meaning that they regained the ability to carry out day-to-day activities such as driving."
The RESTORE study showed patients treated with Lucentis alone or with Lucentis plus laser therapy gained an average of 6.8 letters and 6.4 letters, respectively, in visual acuity at 12 months compared to baseline, while laser-treated patients gained an average of 0.9 letters as measured on a standard ETDRS eye chart.
The RESOLVE study showed that Lucentis-treated patients gained an average of 10.3 letters in visual acuity at 12 months compared to baseline while sham-treated patients, some of whom also received laser treatment, lost an average of 1.4 letters.
"Since its first launch in the EU in 2007, Lucentis has become the gold standard treatment of wet AMD and its use has stimulated research into other ocular conditions," said David Epstein, Division Head of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. "Our continued investment in the clinical development of Lucentis means that another group of patients who are at risk of losing their eyesight will have the option of a licensed therapy that could help save their vision."
"The pivotal data from RESTORE and RESOLVE studies are further supported by results of an independent US study examining Lucentis for the treatment of DME compared to standard of care. Conducted by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net), this study showed that at 12 months patients treated with Lucentis plus laser gained an average of nine letters in visual acuity compared to baseline while patients treated with laser therapy alone gained an average of three to four letters. In addition, the study demonstrated superior gains in visual acuity among Lucentis-treated patients up to two years, with a reduced number of Lucentis injections required the second year compared to the first. Specifically, there was a median of only two to three injections required in the second year of treatment compared to a median of eight to nine injections required in the first year," Novartis said.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a consequence of diabetic retinopathy, the most common diabetic eye complication. DME is characterized by changes in the blood vessels of the retina, which is the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. In patients with DME, leakage from these abnormal blood vessels occurs in the central portion of the retina, called the macula. Because this part of the eye is responsible for sharp central vision, DME can lead to significant visual impairment. Visual impairment due to DME affects approximately 1-3% of patients with diabetes, and DME is a leading cause of blindness in the working-age population in most developed countries.
Lucentis offers an entirely new pharmacological approach to treatment for visual impairment due to DME compared to the current standard of care, which involves the use of laser burns to stop capillary leakage and reduce swelling. Lucentis is an antibody fragment that is injected into the eye and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that is known to increase vascular permeability, resulting in capillary leakage and macular edema in patients with diabetes.
Lucentis was generally well tolerated in DME clinical studies, either when given as monotherapy or when combined with laser treatment. Its safety profile was consistent with the well established profile in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). There was an incidence of arterial thromboembolic events (<=3.5%) observed in the DME clinical trials, consistent with what was seen in the wet AMD clinical trials, with no significant difference between the groups treated with Lucentis compared to sham or laser therapy. Ocular adverse events were similar to those seen in the wet AMD trials, with an incidence of 1.4% endophthalmitis in the pooled pivotal studies.
Lucentis is currently licensed in more than 85 countries for the treatment of wet AMD. It receives continuous safety monitoring via a systematic pharmacovigilance system and there is more than 750,000 patient-treatment years of exposure to date for Lucentis.
Lucentis was developed by Genentech and Novartis. Genentech has the commercial rights to Lucentis in the United States, where Lucentis is also approved for the treatment of macular edema following retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In addition, Genentech is conducting two Phase III studies, RISE and RIDE, in patients with diabetic macular edema with results expected in 2011. Novartis has exclusive rights in the rest of the world and has filed in the European Union for approval of Lucentis for the treatment of visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to RVO.
The European Commission has granted Novartis a new indication for Lucentis (ranibizumab) to treat patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME), a leading cause of blindness in the working-age population in most developed countries.
Laser therapy, the current standard of care, has provided stabilization of vision in many patients, but generally does not improve vision. Lucentis is the first licensed therapy to significantly improve both vision and vision-related quality of life in patients with visual impairment due to DME.
"Similarly to wet age related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema can cause disabling vision loss. While vision loss as a consequence of diabetes affects only a very small proportion of people with the disease, it is one of the most feared complications," said Don Curran, Chair, AMD Alliance International. "Visual impairment impacts everything from managing social interactions to the ability to work - thus, for most people it means a loss of independence."
The approval of Lucentis was based on data from two Novartis-sponsored clinical trials, RESTORE and RESOLVE, which showed that Lucentis was superior in providing rapid and sustained visual acuity gain versus sham (dummy) therapy or laser therapy, the current standard of care.
"In the clinical trials, Lucentis-treated patients began to recover their vision as early as eight days after the first injection on average, and vision improvement was maintained at one year," said Gabriele E. Lang, Professor, University Eye Hospital, University of Ulm, Germany. "The vision improvement for many of these patients was clinically significant, meaning that they regained the ability to carry out day-to-day activities such as driving."
The RESTORE study showed patients treated with Lucentis alone or with Lucentis plus laser therapy gained an average of 6.8 letters and 6.4 letters, respectively, in visual acuity at 12 months compared to baseline, while laser-treated patients gained an average of 0.9 letters as measured on a standard ETDRS eye chart.
The RESOLVE study showed that Lucentis-treated patients gained an average of 10.3 letters in visual acuity at 12 months compared to baseline while sham-treated patients, some of whom also received laser treatment, lost an average of 1.4 letters.
"Since its first launch in the EU in 2007, Lucentis has become the gold standard treatment of wet AMD and its use has stimulated research into other ocular conditions," said David Epstein, Division Head of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. "Our continued investment in the clinical development of Lucentis means that another group of patients who are at risk of losing their eyesight will have the option of a licensed therapy that could help save their vision."
"The pivotal data from RESTORE and RESOLVE studies are further supported by results of an independent US study examining Lucentis for the treatment of DME compared to standard of care. Conducted by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net), this study showed that at 12 months patients treated with Lucentis plus laser gained an average of nine letters in visual acuity compared to baseline while patients treated with laser therapy alone gained an average of three to four letters. In addition, the study demonstrated superior gains in visual acuity among Lucentis-treated patients up to two years, with a reduced number of Lucentis injections required the second year compared to the first. Specifically, there was a median of only two to three injections required in the second year of treatment compared to a median of eight to nine injections required in the first year," Novartis said.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a consequence of diabetic retinopathy, the most common diabetic eye complication. DME is characterized by changes in the blood vessels of the retina, which is the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. In patients with DME, leakage from these abnormal blood vessels occurs in the central portion of the retina, called the macula. Because this part of the eye is responsible for sharp central vision, DME can lead to significant visual impairment. Visual impairment due to DME affects approximately 1-3% of patients with diabetes, and DME is a leading cause of blindness in the working-age population in most developed countries.
Lucentis offers an entirely new pharmacological approach to treatment for visual impairment due to DME compared to the current standard of care, which involves the use of laser burns to stop capillary leakage and reduce swelling. Lucentis is an antibody fragment that is injected into the eye and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that is known to increase vascular permeability, resulting in capillary leakage and macular edema in patients with diabetes.
Lucentis was generally well tolerated in DME clinical studies, either when given as monotherapy or when combined with laser treatment. Its safety profile was consistent with the well established profile in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). There was an incidence of arterial thromboembolic events (<=3.5%) observed in the DME clinical trials, consistent with what was seen in the wet AMD clinical trials, with no significant difference between the groups treated with Lucentis compared to sham or laser therapy. Ocular adverse events were similar to those seen in the wet AMD trials, with an incidence of 1.4% endophthalmitis in the pooled pivotal studies.
Lucentis is currently licensed in more than 85 countries for the treatment of wet AMD. It receives continuous safety monitoring via a systematic pharmacovigilance system and there is more than 750,000 patient-treatment years of exposure to date for Lucentis.
Lucentis was developed by Genentech and Novartis. Genentech has the commercial rights to Lucentis in the United States, where Lucentis is also approved for the treatment of macular edema following retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In addition, Genentech is conducting two Phase III studies, RISE and RIDE, in patients with diabetic macular edema with results expected in 2011. Novartis has exclusive rights in the rest of the world and has filed in the European Union for approval of Lucentis for the treatment of visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to RVO.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Macular Degeneration Treatments
by:Akler Eye Center
Macular degeneration, or Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) is a condition related to aging of the eye that causes loss of the central vision. It is the commonest cause of blindness in Americans over 55 years old. Approximately 10 million people in the United States are affected. Smoking, high blood pressure, family history of ARMD, and poor diet are all risk factors for the development of ARMD.
The macula is the center most part of the retina, and is responsible for the sharp vision that allows us to read and drive. In some people, as the eye ages, deposits develop in the retina (dry ARMD). This can cause the macula to function imperfectly, which leads to blurry vision. Only 10% of patients develop the wet form of ARMD. In this more devastating form, abnormal blood vessels grow in the macula, and when they leak or bleed, severe loss of the central vision often results.
The symptoms of macular degeneration are blurring of the vision, which causes difficulty with reading or driving. Macular degeneration does not cause total blindness because the side vision is not affected.
At Akler Eye Center in Dearborn MI, a complete eye examination including dilation of the pupil will allow Dr. Akler to detect both mild and severe forms of macular degeneration. If ARMD is found, further testing may include a fluorescein angiogram and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fluorescein angiography involves injecting dye into the arm and photographing it as it circulates in the retina. Abnormal blood vessel growth and leakage may be detected. OCT is a computerized picture of the macula that shows if it is swollen with fluid. Both of these tests are performed onsite.
Treatments for macular degeneration are primarily targeted at keeping the retina as healthy as possible and screening for early signs of the wet form of ARMD. A study performed by the National Eye Institute demonstrated that taking special vitamins for the eye that contain anti-oxidants (A, C, E and beta-carotene with zinc) reduces the risk of developing severe vision loss. A home screening tool known as an Amsler Grid allows the patient to check the vision with one eye at a time. If the grid paper lines are wavy or faded, an eye examination is needed urgently.
If the wet form of ARMD is present, the current treatment involves injection of medication into the eye. The medication is targeted at reducing the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the macula.
Dr. Michelle Akler recommends regular eye examinations to screen for macular degeneration, especially in older patients and those with a family history of ARMD. Early detection and treatment allows for the best visual outcome in this difficult condition.
Macular degeneration, or Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) is a condition related to aging of the eye that causes loss of the central vision. It is the commonest cause of blindness in Americans over 55 years old. Approximately 10 million people in the United States are affected. Smoking, high blood pressure, family history of ARMD, and poor diet are all risk factors for the development of ARMD.
The macula is the center most part of the retina, and is responsible for the sharp vision that allows us to read and drive. In some people, as the eye ages, deposits develop in the retina (dry ARMD). This can cause the macula to function imperfectly, which leads to blurry vision. Only 10% of patients develop the wet form of ARMD. In this more devastating form, abnormal blood vessels grow in the macula, and when they leak or bleed, severe loss of the central vision often results.
The symptoms of macular degeneration are blurring of the vision, which causes difficulty with reading or driving. Macular degeneration does not cause total blindness because the side vision is not affected.
At Akler Eye Center in Dearborn MI, a complete eye examination including dilation of the pupil will allow Dr. Akler to detect both mild and severe forms of macular degeneration. If ARMD is found, further testing may include a fluorescein angiogram and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fluorescein angiography involves injecting dye into the arm and photographing it as it circulates in the retina. Abnormal blood vessel growth and leakage may be detected. OCT is a computerized picture of the macula that shows if it is swollen with fluid. Both of these tests are performed onsite.
Treatments for macular degeneration are primarily targeted at keeping the retina as healthy as possible and screening for early signs of the wet form of ARMD. A study performed by the National Eye Institute demonstrated that taking special vitamins for the eye that contain anti-oxidants (A, C, E and beta-carotene with zinc) reduces the risk of developing severe vision loss. A home screening tool known as an Amsler Grid allows the patient to check the vision with one eye at a time. If the grid paper lines are wavy or faded, an eye examination is needed urgently.
If the wet form of ARMD is present, the current treatment involves injection of medication into the eye. The medication is targeted at reducing the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the macula.
Dr. Michelle Akler recommends regular eye examinations to screen for macular degeneration, especially in older patients and those with a family history of ARMD. Early detection and treatment allows for the best visual outcome in this difficult condition.
Monday, December 27, 2010
Treatment For Wet Macular Degeneration in Seniors
by: Admin
The National Eye Institute (NEI) had published their facts about Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) to help patients and their family members to search for general information about the disease.
Age Related Wet Macular Degeneration
In its attempt to ensure better public understanding of the disease, it had detailed the ARMD by starting on its definition. The NEI defined ARMD as “a disease associated with aging that gradually destroys sharp, central vision.” It is then explained that central vision is important to see fine details and helps common daily tasks such as reading and driving. It has to be noted that ARMD causes no physical pain to the patients.
There are two types of ARMD, which is the dry and the wet ARMD. In most cases, elderly adults develop the dry ARMD and it is the most common form of the disease, with some of them progressing into wet ARMD when abnormal blood vessels start developing and ruptures within. Wet ARMD can be treated, but not fully cured, by laser surgery, photodynamic therapy and injections into the eye. These treatments may actually just delay the process of being legally blind, but patients need to be aware that conditions will continue to worsen over time.
Treating wet ARMD with Laser surgery is a procedure which utilizes the laser technology to destroy fragile, leaky blood vessels that had formed abnormally. A high energy light beam is directly focused on the new blood vessels, and it destroys them to prevent further loss of vision. The negative side of this treatment is that it potentially destroys other healthy cells surrounding the treatment area.
Only a small percentage of patients may use laser to treat wet ARMD. The procedure is performed at the doctor’s office or an eye clinic, and laser is more effective if the abnormal, leaky blood vessels are developed away from the middle of the macula, which is called the fovea. It does not mean that the abnormal blood vessels will automatically stop developing after laser surgery, in fact repeated treatments are necessary as the risk of developing new abnormal blood vessels post surgery is high. In some cases, the patient may still suffer vision loss progressively despite repeated treatments.
Another treatment, called the photodynamic therapy, involves the injection of a drug called verteporfin into the patient’s arm, and it travels throughout the body including the new blood vessels in the eye. The drug will attach itself to the surface of new blood vessels. After this, the doctor shines a light into the patients eye for about 90 seconds to activate the drug. The drug, once activated, will destroy the new blood vessels and helps slower down the rate of vision decline. It is topical and aims only at the new blood vessels, so it does not destroy surrounding healthy tissues and cells like the laser surgery.
However, caution has to be taken with the use of this drug. As it gets activated by lights, patient has to avoid going outdoors, or exposing skin or eye to direct sunlight or bright indoor lights for five days after treatment. Remember that the drug is administered through injection on the patient’s arm, and the fact that it travels throughout the body instead of being contained within the eye.
This treatment is basically painless, and can be performed at the doctor’s office in about 20 minutes. However, while it slows down the rate of vision loss, it does not stop vision loss, or restore the patient’s vision if it was already damaged by ARMD. Again, this technique will require repeated treatments as necessary, based on the doctor’s prescription and the progress of your condition.
Another treatment is the use of injection, this time with new drugs that are injected directly into the eyes. The anti-VEGF therapy will see these new drugs block the effects of the specific growth factor that triggers the abnormal blood vessels. Multiple injections will be required, and it can be a monthly affair. Before injection, the eyes are numbed. After injection, the patient will be kept at the doctor’s office for a while so that the doctor may monitor the progress of the eyes before declaring that the patient is safe to go home. It is said that this treatment helps slow down vision loss from ARMD and may also help to improve the sight of patients in some cases.
In any of these treatments, the patient should listen to the doctor because the doctor will know the best option available for each individual.
The National Eye Institute (NEI) had published their facts about Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) to help patients and their family members to search for general information about the disease.
Age Related Wet Macular Degeneration
In its attempt to ensure better public understanding of the disease, it had detailed the ARMD by starting on its definition. The NEI defined ARMD as “a disease associated with aging that gradually destroys sharp, central vision.” It is then explained that central vision is important to see fine details and helps common daily tasks such as reading and driving. It has to be noted that ARMD causes no physical pain to the patients.
There are two types of ARMD, which is the dry and the wet ARMD. In most cases, elderly adults develop the dry ARMD and it is the most common form of the disease, with some of them progressing into wet ARMD when abnormal blood vessels start developing and ruptures within. Wet ARMD can be treated, but not fully cured, by laser surgery, photodynamic therapy and injections into the eye. These treatments may actually just delay the process of being legally blind, but patients need to be aware that conditions will continue to worsen over time.
Treating wet ARMD with Laser surgery is a procedure which utilizes the laser technology to destroy fragile, leaky blood vessels that had formed abnormally. A high energy light beam is directly focused on the new blood vessels, and it destroys them to prevent further loss of vision. The negative side of this treatment is that it potentially destroys other healthy cells surrounding the treatment area.
Only a small percentage of patients may use laser to treat wet ARMD. The procedure is performed at the doctor’s office or an eye clinic, and laser is more effective if the abnormal, leaky blood vessels are developed away from the middle of the macula, which is called the fovea. It does not mean that the abnormal blood vessels will automatically stop developing after laser surgery, in fact repeated treatments are necessary as the risk of developing new abnormal blood vessels post surgery is high. In some cases, the patient may still suffer vision loss progressively despite repeated treatments.
Another treatment, called the photodynamic therapy, involves the injection of a drug called verteporfin into the patient’s arm, and it travels throughout the body including the new blood vessels in the eye. The drug will attach itself to the surface of new blood vessels. After this, the doctor shines a light into the patients eye for about 90 seconds to activate the drug. The drug, once activated, will destroy the new blood vessels and helps slower down the rate of vision decline. It is topical and aims only at the new blood vessels, so it does not destroy surrounding healthy tissues and cells like the laser surgery.
However, caution has to be taken with the use of this drug. As it gets activated by lights, patient has to avoid going outdoors, or exposing skin or eye to direct sunlight or bright indoor lights for five days after treatment. Remember that the drug is administered through injection on the patient’s arm, and the fact that it travels throughout the body instead of being contained within the eye.
This treatment is basically painless, and can be performed at the doctor’s office in about 20 minutes. However, while it slows down the rate of vision loss, it does not stop vision loss, or restore the patient’s vision if it was already damaged by ARMD. Again, this technique will require repeated treatments as necessary, based on the doctor’s prescription and the progress of your condition.
Another treatment is the use of injection, this time with new drugs that are injected directly into the eyes. The anti-VEGF therapy will see these new drugs block the effects of the specific growth factor that triggers the abnormal blood vessels. Multiple injections will be required, and it can be a monthly affair. Before injection, the eyes are numbed. After injection, the patient will be kept at the doctor’s office for a while so that the doctor may monitor the progress of the eyes before declaring that the patient is safe to go home. It is said that this treatment helps slow down vision loss from ARMD and may also help to improve the sight of patients in some cases.
In any of these treatments, the patient should listen to the doctor because the doctor will know the best option available for each individual.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Zeaxanthin For Macular Degeneration Prevention and Treatment in Dry AMD
by The Pulitzer
Most ophthalmologists recommend the antioxidants lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is age related, commonly referred to as AMD. It is unusual for doctor’s to recommend nutritional supplements of any kind, unless a person has an outright deficiency, but AMD is a unique condition.
There are no effective treatments for one type of AMD (dry), but there are some partially effective treatments for wet AMD. Together, these two are the major causes of blindness in the elderly. The wet form is the most severe, if not treated early.
In wet AMD, blood vessels grow up and behind the retina, an area responsible for gathering light and transmitting signals to the brain, resulting in sight. The blood vessels often rupture and leak blood and protein below the macula, a very sensitive area within the retina.
Eventually, bleeding, leaking and scarring causes irreversible damage to the light receptors (rods and cones). Rapid vision loss is experienced if it is left untreated. Laser treatment and drugs that inhibit blood vessel growth are usually recommended.
Generally, doctors recommend lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is of the dry type. Dry AMD is much more common than wet. It is caused by a build up of yellow deposits called drusen on the retina.
In nature lutein and zeaxanthin are pigments or colors. They are normally present in the retina, with zeaxanthin being concentrated in the macula and lutein more highly concentrated in the periphery of the retina. There roles within the eye are not well understood, but they seem to help reduce or prevent the build up of drusen.
Drusen is similar in composition to the deposits that are found in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients and the plaque that is present in atherosclerosis. People with either of those two conditions have a higher risk of developing dry AMD.
Some doctors recommend taking lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention, particularly to their patients that have a family history of the disease. But, since the drusen are similar to the deposits that cause Alzheimer’s and heart disease, other antioxidants may be beneficial, as well.
Curcumin, an antioxidant present in the spice turmeric, is currently being studied for its benefit in Alzheimer’s disease. Not only does it prevent the accumulation of the plaque, it breaks it up. It might be able to break up the drusen in AMD, too.
One study indicates that the ideal combination of nutrients is omega 3 fatty acids, beta carotene, vitamin E, lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration. Omega 3 fatty acids, particularly DHA, are the most abundant fatty acids present in the retina. Beta-carotene is converted by the body to vitamin A, which is essential for good vision. Vitamin E is well-known for its antioxidant activity.
Prevention is worth a pound of cure, they say. In order to prevent AMD, people should lower their total fat intake, and increase their nutrient intake. This may help reduce the risk of many other diseases, as well. Taking zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention is a good idea. Taking a multi-nutritional supplement that contains it, is a great one.
Valerie Rosenbaum researches omega 3 fish oil supplements, anti aging supplements and natural skincare products. Through her research she has discovered the best anti aging supplement, in both quality and value, available today.
Most ophthalmologists recommend the antioxidants lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is age related, commonly referred to as AMD. It is unusual for doctor’s to recommend nutritional supplements of any kind, unless a person has an outright deficiency, but AMD is a unique condition.
There are no effective treatments for one type of AMD (dry), but there are some partially effective treatments for wet AMD. Together, these two are the major causes of blindness in the elderly. The wet form is the most severe, if not treated early.
In wet AMD, blood vessels grow up and behind the retina, an area responsible for gathering light and transmitting signals to the brain, resulting in sight. The blood vessels often rupture and leak blood and protein below the macula, a very sensitive area within the retina.
Eventually, bleeding, leaking and scarring causes irreversible damage to the light receptors (rods and cones). Rapid vision loss is experienced if it is left untreated. Laser treatment and drugs that inhibit blood vessel growth are usually recommended.
Generally, doctors recommend lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is of the dry type. Dry AMD is much more common than wet. It is caused by a build up of yellow deposits called drusen on the retina.
In nature lutein and zeaxanthin are pigments or colors. They are normally present in the retina, with zeaxanthin being concentrated in the macula and lutein more highly concentrated in the periphery of the retina. There roles within the eye are not well understood, but they seem to help reduce or prevent the build up of drusen.
Drusen is similar in composition to the deposits that are found in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients and the plaque that is present in atherosclerosis. People with either of those two conditions have a higher risk of developing dry AMD.
Some doctors recommend taking lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention, particularly to their patients that have a family history of the disease. But, since the drusen are similar to the deposits that cause Alzheimer’s and heart disease, other antioxidants may be beneficial, as well.
Curcumin, an antioxidant present in the spice turmeric, is currently being studied for its benefit in Alzheimer’s disease. Not only does it prevent the accumulation of the plaque, it breaks it up. It might be able to break up the drusen in AMD, too.
One study indicates that the ideal combination of nutrients is omega 3 fatty acids, beta carotene, vitamin E, lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration. Omega 3 fatty acids, particularly DHA, are the most abundant fatty acids present in the retina. Beta-carotene is converted by the body to vitamin A, which is essential for good vision. Vitamin E is well-known for its antioxidant activity.
Prevention is worth a pound of cure, they say. In order to prevent AMD, people should lower their total fat intake, and increase their nutrient intake. This may help reduce the risk of many other diseases, as well. Taking zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention is a good idea. Taking a multi-nutritional supplement that contains it, is a great one.
Valerie Rosenbaum researches omega 3 fish oil supplements, anti aging supplements and natural skincare products. Through her research she has discovered the best anti aging supplement, in both quality and value, available today.
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Advance Cell Technology's CEO says Markets Are Just Starting to Appreciate the Significance of Thei
by Advance Cell Technology
The excitement around ACTC comes after a recent series of key positive announcements including the fact that the FDA granted orphan drug status to the micro-cap's patented embryonic stem cell derived treatment for specific forms of Macular Degeneration and blindness (Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy and Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration). The eye conditions destroy the pigmented layer of retina (retinal pigment epithelium) which is the pigmented cell layer just outside the neurosensory retina that nourishes retinal visual cells.
The condition destroys the pigmented layer of retina (retinal pigment epithelium) which is the pigmented cell layer just outside the neurosensory retina that nourishes retinal visual cells. Advanced Cell Technology has shown success introducing the embryonic stem cell derived RPE cells into the eye in animal models and this resulted in 100% improvement with no side effects for more than 220 days. Human clinical trials are expected to start in the first quarter of 2011, and can potentially take only a few weeks to show positive results.
Advanced Cell Technology has shown success introducing the embryonic stem cell derived RPE cells into the eye in animal models and this resulted in 100% improvement with no side effects for more than 220 days. Human clinical trials are expected to start in the first quarter of 2011, and could potentially take only a few weeks to show positive results according to some analysts.
In addition, for only the second time in history (following Geron's therapy for spinal cord injury), the FDA granted approval for clinical trials for a therapy derived from human embryonic stem cells.
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC tells BioMedReports that ACTC plans on building upon their orphan drug status and accelerating clinical testing. In addition, they hope to continue showing promising advancements in other forms of regenerative medicine which the company is developing -- most notably its Myoblast program for the treatment of heart failure. The Myoblast program (part of the company's 2007 acquisition of Mytogen, Inc.) has successfully completed Phase I human clinical trials and the FDA has finished reviewing the data, thus allowing Advanced Cell Technology to proceed with a Phase II human clinical trial (in approximately 160 patients) early next year.
BioMedReports: It appears that suddenly your company has a lot of attention given your news developments. What do you make of all the activity in your stock during recent days?
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: The market is starting to appreciate the significance of the FDA approval of our particular therapy. I think they are now beginning to understand the strategy of having filed for an orphan indication designation for Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy (SMD is one of the most common forms of juvenile macular degeneration in the world) and they now realize that that represents the first wave, with potentially huge commercial opportunities in Dry AMD (Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration reportedly afflicts more than 30 million people worldwide, including an estimated 13-15 million Americans). Both indications do not have viable therapies and so to the extent that our program can make an impact, it's going to not only help a very large patient population, it -- as well as any other therapies that are approved -- will help validate a very large technology.
BioMedReports: Can you help us digest or simplify what some of those implications are?
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: I can certainly try. Right now, Genentech has a drug on the market for Wet AMD [Note: the FDA approved Lucentis in 2006 after a 6-month priority review] and that patient population is substantially less than the Dry AMD component. Their procedure is to apply a needle into the eye every two to three months with their therapy and for that they get some $2500, plus or minus, for each injection. In our particular situation, we are inserting a needle into the eye- which is something that is done all the time, by the way, this isn't something that's foreign to the practitioner that does the application -- but our application takes place only once or possibly twice over the life of the patient. It is our expectation that the therapy which we'll apply will have an impact on either slowing down or arresting the progression of the disease. We've seen that in our animal models. There have been some very dramatic results when we've applied it into animals and we are extremely hopeful that we will see the same types of results when we apply it into humans.
The problem has been that this technology is totally new to the world of medicine. It is an embryonic stem cell derived therapy. It turns out that our cells have been derived utilizing what we call a blastomere technology which means that we have been able to develop those stem cells without any embryo destruction, which somewhat mitigates the issues that have been in the media.
So, we take our particular stem cell therapy -- and remember that the stem cells are converted into a single cell type so there's really no actual stem cells into the therapy that we are applying only a certain cell-type and in this particular case, it's what they call RPE (retinal pigment epithelial) cells. That RPE layer is in the eye between the photoreceptor and the Bruch's membrane. It protects that photoreceptor -- which gives us the ability to see -- and it also nourishes it. With deterioration, all sorts of different diseases occur. One of which is Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy and another of which is Dry AMD. Now, there are certainly different characteristics to those, but to the extent that you can replenish that RPE layer with new, healthy, viable cells you have the opportunity to dramatically impact the deterioration that is occurring within the photoreceptor.
That's a layman's description of what we're doing with respect to that therapy, but more importantly the market implication is such that if you have in excess of ten million patients currently suffering from that disease; which is age related and as we know the baby boomers are getting older. Unfortunately for those of us that are getting into that post fifty-five or sixty year-old age range, those individuals are prime candidates for this disease. That market is fairly significant. There is an opportunity of tremendous magnitude for a company like ours.
BioMedReports: Let's talk about the structure of the company for a bit. There have been some concerns that there are a lot of shares out there and that a company that is set up in this way could suddenly announce something like a reverse-split during a run-up in price like this one. What are your comments in regard to that as far as ACTC goes?
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: I'm an investment banker and I can tell you that it has been my experience that reverse splits for the sake of reverse splits are very problematic. There has to be a rationale behind why someone would do such a thing and it has to be done around some sort of event that is accretive to shareholders and makes logical sense for all the stakeholders. I'm not inclined at all to recommend a reverse split unless that opportunity presented itself. If it does, based upon our charter, we would then have to go to the shareholders for their approval. In that way they would have an opportunity to understand our rationale and determine whether that makes sense for the majority of them. I think that's about all I can say about that subject at this stage.
BioMedReports: Can you talk about any of the upcoming milestones for the company? Some think that is part of the reason for this run-up, that there are some events worth looking forward to on the horizon.
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: I think we've alluded to some things a couple of times either on blogs or in conferences, and I can start with the approval of our IND for Stargardt's Disease which we will be seeing some time in the first half of the coming year. (That will mark) us going into the clinic. And we have already alluded to the fact that we will go into multiple sites, not just one particular site, for the reason that we have filed for Phase I/Phase II. For those who are not familiar with that, Phase I really focuses on safety. That's going to be a very, very important piece, not just because of the safety, but because it will ensure for the FDA that this cell type can be safe in humans.
You know the first one is always the toughest one, so we've designed the trial to be very, very slow in its evolution. We have a dosage escalation schedule whereby we're only inserting a minimal amount of cells at the outset per patient. Then we will increase that with ensuing patients and we'll pause to allow the FDA to review the results of that so that they can feel comfortable with the safety issues related to the fact that the cells go where they are supposed to go and do what they're supposed to do and that they don't cause any side effects, or tumors or anything else that has been ballyhooed around. By the way, we have never, in any of our studies, ever seen that.
So, I can't speak for others, but for us; our patented differentiation processes are such that our cells are terminally and totally differentiated into the cell type that we're dealing with. Once we do that, then we'll move quickly into efficacy and that tells us, of course, "does it work?" And that's why we're starting out with multiple sites. Right now, I'm in the process of finalizing those sites and developing a relationship with the primary investigator -- the surgeon at each of the sites. I'm working with the internal review boards to gain approval on the protocols on any specific issues that they may have relative to their particular situation and then we will initiate those trials when all of that is completed.
The second major milestone is that we've filed a second IND. That one is for the Dry AMD and we anticipate that it will take much less time for the FDA to evaluate that, versus the time they took to evaluate the first one. We anticipate that sometime in the first quarter (of 2011) there is a very reasonable chance that we will see approval for that IND -- at which time we will then initiate trials for that program as well. Just so you know, it's the same cells. So we're really just taking the same cell-type and treating a different disease-type. So that's why we're relatively bullish on that particular program.
A third area that we've announced is that as big as the market is, and the opportunity is here in the United States, the European community offers a similar opportunity. And with the E.U. controlling the regulatory perspective for the various countries on the continent, we will be looking very hard at the opportunity to take both our Stargardt's and Dry AMD programs over there. I've been spending some time over there trying to ascertain what the best way is to do it and where the best places are to initiate the trials as well as learning a little bit about the process of how to work through the regulatory situations over there. We should be in position to make an announcement about that in the first half of next year.
We've also mentioned another disease condition called our Myoblast or heart program. It's an adult stem cell -- meaning it's the patient's own cells -- in this particular instance. We extract out of the thigh in a biopsy and then we re-place it into the heart with a catheter system. Basically, it goes over the dead heart tissue from a heart attack that a patient has had. And what those cells do, those myoblast cells, is they integrate with the good cardio myocyte cells -- the heart cells -- and help those cells pump the blood in and out of the heart. That's important because when you have a heart attack, part of your heart muscle is killed or dead, and unlike other parts of the body the muscle doesn't regenerate itself and so the remaining muscle has to work harder and the heart becomes a little weaker. Because of the strain on the muscle it gets, sometimes, enlarged. The walls get thinner and that's when you start seeing heart failure. What this does is that it helps mitigate that and the patient can start feeling better. That's really where the FDA is focused on, is the quality of life of the patient. Most of the patients that we're dealing with are in advanced age heart failure. So that is another disease condition. We have gotten approval from the FDA to move out of the Phase I, where we did four trials, and we're moving into Phase II. I've made an announcement that we intend to do that in the first half of next year. So again, that is another program that you should be hearing some things from us about during the first half of next year.
So just in the first half of the coming year we have some fairly significant milestones that we have before us and then there are a couple that we're working on now that we haven't announced yet.
The excitement around ACTC comes after a recent series of key positive announcements including the fact that the FDA granted orphan drug status to the micro-cap's patented embryonic stem cell derived treatment for specific forms of Macular Degeneration and blindness (Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy and Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration). The eye conditions destroy the pigmented layer of retina (retinal pigment epithelium) which is the pigmented cell layer just outside the neurosensory retina that nourishes retinal visual cells.
The condition destroys the pigmented layer of retina (retinal pigment epithelium) which is the pigmented cell layer just outside the neurosensory retina that nourishes retinal visual cells. Advanced Cell Technology has shown success introducing the embryonic stem cell derived RPE cells into the eye in animal models and this resulted in 100% improvement with no side effects for more than 220 days. Human clinical trials are expected to start in the first quarter of 2011, and can potentially take only a few weeks to show positive results.
Advanced Cell Technology has shown success introducing the embryonic stem cell derived RPE cells into the eye in animal models and this resulted in 100% improvement with no side effects for more than 220 days. Human clinical trials are expected to start in the first quarter of 2011, and could potentially take only a few weeks to show positive results according to some analysts.
In addition, for only the second time in history (following Geron's therapy for spinal cord injury), the FDA granted approval for clinical trials for a therapy derived from human embryonic stem cells.
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC tells BioMedReports that ACTC plans on building upon their orphan drug status and accelerating clinical testing. In addition, they hope to continue showing promising advancements in other forms of regenerative medicine which the company is developing -- most notably its Myoblast program for the treatment of heart failure. The Myoblast program (part of the company's 2007 acquisition of Mytogen, Inc.) has successfully completed Phase I human clinical trials and the FDA has finished reviewing the data, thus allowing Advanced Cell Technology to proceed with a Phase II human clinical trial (in approximately 160 patients) early next year.
BioMedReports: It appears that suddenly your company has a lot of attention given your news developments. What do you make of all the activity in your stock during recent days?
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: The market is starting to appreciate the significance of the FDA approval of our particular therapy. I think they are now beginning to understand the strategy of having filed for an orphan indication designation for Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy (SMD is one of the most common forms of juvenile macular degeneration in the world) and they now realize that that represents the first wave, with potentially huge commercial opportunities in Dry AMD (Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration reportedly afflicts more than 30 million people worldwide, including an estimated 13-15 million Americans). Both indications do not have viable therapies and so to the extent that our program can make an impact, it's going to not only help a very large patient population, it -- as well as any other therapies that are approved -- will help validate a very large technology.
BioMedReports: Can you help us digest or simplify what some of those implications are?
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: I can certainly try. Right now, Genentech has a drug on the market for Wet AMD [Note: the FDA approved Lucentis in 2006 after a 6-month priority review] and that patient population is substantially less than the Dry AMD component. Their procedure is to apply a needle into the eye every two to three months with their therapy and for that they get some $2500, plus or minus, for each injection. In our particular situation, we are inserting a needle into the eye- which is something that is done all the time, by the way, this isn't something that's foreign to the practitioner that does the application -- but our application takes place only once or possibly twice over the life of the patient. It is our expectation that the therapy which we'll apply will have an impact on either slowing down or arresting the progression of the disease. We've seen that in our animal models. There have been some very dramatic results when we've applied it into animals and we are extremely hopeful that we will see the same types of results when we apply it into humans.
The problem has been that this technology is totally new to the world of medicine. It is an embryonic stem cell derived therapy. It turns out that our cells have been derived utilizing what we call a blastomere technology which means that we have been able to develop those stem cells without any embryo destruction, which somewhat mitigates the issues that have been in the media.
So, we take our particular stem cell therapy -- and remember that the stem cells are converted into a single cell type so there's really no actual stem cells into the therapy that we are applying only a certain cell-type and in this particular case, it's what they call RPE (retinal pigment epithelial) cells. That RPE layer is in the eye between the photoreceptor and the Bruch's membrane. It protects that photoreceptor -- which gives us the ability to see -- and it also nourishes it. With deterioration, all sorts of different diseases occur. One of which is Stargardt's Macular Dystrophy and another of which is Dry AMD. Now, there are certainly different characteristics to those, but to the extent that you can replenish that RPE layer with new, healthy, viable cells you have the opportunity to dramatically impact the deterioration that is occurring within the photoreceptor.
That's a layman's description of what we're doing with respect to that therapy, but more importantly the market implication is such that if you have in excess of ten million patients currently suffering from that disease; which is age related and as we know the baby boomers are getting older. Unfortunately for those of us that are getting into that post fifty-five or sixty year-old age range, those individuals are prime candidates for this disease. That market is fairly significant. There is an opportunity of tremendous magnitude for a company like ours.
BioMedReports: Let's talk about the structure of the company for a bit. There have been some concerns that there are a lot of shares out there and that a company that is set up in this way could suddenly announce something like a reverse-split during a run-up in price like this one. What are your comments in regard to that as far as ACTC goes?
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: I'm an investment banker and I can tell you that it has been my experience that reverse splits for the sake of reverse splits are very problematic. There has to be a rationale behind why someone would do such a thing and it has to be done around some sort of event that is accretive to shareholders and makes logical sense for all the stakeholders. I'm not inclined at all to recommend a reverse split unless that opportunity presented itself. If it does, based upon our charter, we would then have to go to the shareholders for their approval. In that way they would have an opportunity to understand our rationale and determine whether that makes sense for the majority of them. I think that's about all I can say about that subject at this stage.
BioMedReports: Can you talk about any of the upcoming milestones for the company? Some think that is part of the reason for this run-up, that there are some events worth looking forward to on the horizon.
William M. Caldwell, Chairman and CEO of ACTC: I think we've alluded to some things a couple of times either on blogs or in conferences, and I can start with the approval of our IND for Stargardt's Disease which we will be seeing some time in the first half of the coming year. (That will mark) us going into the clinic. And we have already alluded to the fact that we will go into multiple sites, not just one particular site, for the reason that we have filed for Phase I/Phase II. For those who are not familiar with that, Phase I really focuses on safety. That's going to be a very, very important piece, not just because of the safety, but because it will ensure for the FDA that this cell type can be safe in humans.
You know the first one is always the toughest one, so we've designed the trial to be very, very slow in its evolution. We have a dosage escalation schedule whereby we're only inserting a minimal amount of cells at the outset per patient. Then we will increase that with ensuing patients and we'll pause to allow the FDA to review the results of that so that they can feel comfortable with the safety issues related to the fact that the cells go where they are supposed to go and do what they're supposed to do and that they don't cause any side effects, or tumors or anything else that has been ballyhooed around. By the way, we have never, in any of our studies, ever seen that.
So, I can't speak for others, but for us; our patented differentiation processes are such that our cells are terminally and totally differentiated into the cell type that we're dealing with. Once we do that, then we'll move quickly into efficacy and that tells us, of course, "does it work?" And that's why we're starting out with multiple sites. Right now, I'm in the process of finalizing those sites and developing a relationship with the primary investigator -- the surgeon at each of the sites. I'm working with the internal review boards to gain approval on the protocols on any specific issues that they may have relative to their particular situation and then we will initiate those trials when all of that is completed.
The second major milestone is that we've filed a second IND. That one is for the Dry AMD and we anticipate that it will take much less time for the FDA to evaluate that, versus the time they took to evaluate the first one. We anticipate that sometime in the first quarter (of 2011) there is a very reasonable chance that we will see approval for that IND -- at which time we will then initiate trials for that program as well. Just so you know, it's the same cells. So we're really just taking the same cell-type and treating a different disease-type. So that's why we're relatively bullish on that particular program.
A third area that we've announced is that as big as the market is, and the opportunity is here in the United States, the European community offers a similar opportunity. And with the E.U. controlling the regulatory perspective for the various countries on the continent, we will be looking very hard at the opportunity to take both our Stargardt's and Dry AMD programs over there. I've been spending some time over there trying to ascertain what the best way is to do it and where the best places are to initiate the trials as well as learning a little bit about the process of how to work through the regulatory situations over there. We should be in position to make an announcement about that in the first half of next year.
We've also mentioned another disease condition called our Myoblast or heart program. It's an adult stem cell -- meaning it's the patient's own cells -- in this particular instance. We extract out of the thigh in a biopsy and then we re-place it into the heart with a catheter system. Basically, it goes over the dead heart tissue from a heart attack that a patient has had. And what those cells do, those myoblast cells, is they integrate with the good cardio myocyte cells -- the heart cells -- and help those cells pump the blood in and out of the heart. That's important because when you have a heart attack, part of your heart muscle is killed or dead, and unlike other parts of the body the muscle doesn't regenerate itself and so the remaining muscle has to work harder and the heart becomes a little weaker. Because of the strain on the muscle it gets, sometimes, enlarged. The walls get thinner and that's when you start seeing heart failure. What this does is that it helps mitigate that and the patient can start feeling better. That's really where the FDA is focused on, is the quality of life of the patient. Most of the patients that we're dealing with are in advanced age heart failure. So that is another disease condition. We have gotten approval from the FDA to move out of the Phase I, where we did four trials, and we're moving into Phase II. I've made an announcement that we intend to do that in the first half of next year. So again, that is another program that you should be hearing some things from us about during the first half of next year.
So just in the first half of the coming year we have some fairly significant milestones that we have before us and then there are a couple that we're working on now that we haven't announced yet.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Retinal Disease Treatments Double Over 10 Years
by:Jen Blackstock
When most people think of diabetes, the first thing to come to mind is rarely blindness, yet blindness is a very real complication of diabetes: Diabetes is actually the number one cause of new blindness in the United States.
Diabetic retinopathy happens when diabetes damages the tiny blood vessels inside the retina, which therefore stop feeding the retina properly, according to the American Foundation for the Blind. Symptoms can include blurry or double vision; rings, flashing lights or blank spots; dark or floating spots; pain or pressure in one or both of your eyes; and trouble seeing things out of the corners of your eyes. Forty percent of people with diabetes have some form of diabetic retinopathy.
With the rise in the number of people with diabetes and the aging American population, it is no surprise that the number of older Americans undergoing treatment for retinal conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy increased 192 percent between 1997 and 2007. Additionally, there has been a significant shift in the types of procedures being performed, a new study has found.
Age-related macular degeneration is a progressive disease of the retina that causes the loss of central vision. Both age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy can cause vision loss and blindness.
The study analyzed Medicare data from 1997 to 2007 and found that the number of retinal procedures increased 192 percent during that period. The largest year-to-year increase (20 percent) occurred between 2006 and 2007, according to the study published in the October issue of the journal Archives of Ophthalmology.
In terms of actual procedures performed, the largest increase was in treatments for neovascular, or "wet," AMD. New treatments for this condition include intravitreal therapy, or drug injections directly into the eye, of antibodies that block the formation of new blood vessels. From 1997 to 2001, only 5,000 of these procedures were performed each year. By 2007, the number had jumped to 812,413. Also increasing is the use of vitrectomy, a surgery to remove the gel inside the eye in order to treat retinal detachment -- increased 72 percent between 1997 and 2007.
"Retinal disease is highly prevalent among older individuals, and both age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy account for more than half the irreversible blindness in older Americans. The prevalence of both macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy increases with age, and the number of Americans affected by these conditions is expected to increase substantially as the number of Americans older than 65 years doubles from 2010 to 2040," says study author Dr. Pradeep Ramulu, of Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.
With the rise of cases of diabetes and the aging of the baby boomer population in the United States, eye care and blindness prevention is becoming increasingly important within the medical community.
When most people think of diabetes, the first thing to come to mind is rarely blindness, yet blindness is a very real complication of diabetes: Diabetes is actually the number one cause of new blindness in the United States.
Diabetic retinopathy happens when diabetes damages the tiny blood vessels inside the retina, which therefore stop feeding the retina properly, according to the American Foundation for the Blind. Symptoms can include blurry or double vision; rings, flashing lights or blank spots; dark or floating spots; pain or pressure in one or both of your eyes; and trouble seeing things out of the corners of your eyes. Forty percent of people with diabetes have some form of diabetic retinopathy.
With the rise in the number of people with diabetes and the aging American population, it is no surprise that the number of older Americans undergoing treatment for retinal conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy increased 192 percent between 1997 and 2007. Additionally, there has been a significant shift in the types of procedures being performed, a new study has found.
Age-related macular degeneration is a progressive disease of the retina that causes the loss of central vision. Both age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy can cause vision loss and blindness.
The study analyzed Medicare data from 1997 to 2007 and found that the number of retinal procedures increased 192 percent during that period. The largest year-to-year increase (20 percent) occurred between 2006 and 2007, according to the study published in the October issue of the journal Archives of Ophthalmology.
In terms of actual procedures performed, the largest increase was in treatments for neovascular, or "wet," AMD. New treatments for this condition include intravitreal therapy, or drug injections directly into the eye, of antibodies that block the formation of new blood vessels. From 1997 to 2001, only 5,000 of these procedures were performed each year. By 2007, the number had jumped to 812,413. Also increasing is the use of vitrectomy, a surgery to remove the gel inside the eye in order to treat retinal detachment -- increased 72 percent between 1997 and 2007.
"Retinal disease is highly prevalent among older individuals, and both age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy account for more than half the irreversible blindness in older Americans. The prevalence of both macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy increases with age, and the number of Americans affected by these conditions is expected to increase substantially as the number of Americans older than 65 years doubles from 2010 to 2040," says study author Dr. Pradeep Ramulu, of Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.
With the rise of cases of diabetes and the aging of the baby boomer population in the United States, eye care and blindness prevention is becoming increasingly important within the medical community.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Limited Retinal Translocation for Wet Macular Degeneration
Posted by Administration
Limited Retinal Translocation-Limited retinal translocation is another treatment aimed at wet macular degeneration. In this procedure the retina is actually moved somewhat to allow laser treatments to be applied more successfully to abnormal blood vessel growth. The procedure is still in the macular degeneration treatments developmental stages in terms of approval for commercial applications. Surgical options for dry macular degeneration are proposed periodically. The methodologies change from procedure to procedure, but the general idea is the same.
Limited Retinal Translocation-Limited retinal translocation is another treatment aimed at wet macular degeneration. In this procedure the retina is actually moved somewhat to allow laser treatments to be applied more successfully to abnormal blood vessel growth. The procedure is still in the macular degeneration treatments developmental stages in terms of approval for commercial applications. Surgical options for dry macular degeneration are proposed periodically. The methodologies change from procedure to procedure, but the general idea is the same.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Gene Therapy/ Treatment for Visual Impairment
Gene Therapy For Visual Impairment
By: Mark Burnsy
In modern society where most people are educated, eyesight problems inevitably proliferate, due to the fact that they have spent more time in reading. TV and computers are also incentives of the skyrocketed eyesight problems. Owing to the invention of eyeglasses and contact lenses, people with nearsightedness, farsightedness, astigmatism and presbyopia are able to view a clear world as well. Additionally, fast developed, eyeglass manufactures achieve advancement in glare reduction and unwanted wavelengths of light elimination.
However, eyeglasses and contacts can not serve as helps for vision improvement of people suffering from eye diseases, such as Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Retinopathy. Recently, a medical treatment is developed, which is also able to treat visual impairments. Avastin is a drug that was originally used in Colo-rectal cancer treatments but is found to have an ability to improve the vision in patients with Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy and other vascular related retinal diseases. What's more, many other new drugs are brought about in succession as well, for example, the non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs can reduce retinal inflammation and cyst formations.
There are some people whose eye diseases arise from within the patients, genetic and congenital disorders. They pose a great challenge to eye doctors and surgeons. Luckily, gene therapy is found to be able to dramatically improve those patients' vision. The procedure is performed at the Scheie Eye Institute in Philadelphia and the patients formerly suffering from Leber's Congenital Amaurosis claim that he could read letters on an eye chart already after such a procedure. Then the news was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, on which the cause of Leber's Congenital Amaurosis and how the surgery achieves an success are recorded. It is stated that a lack of RPE 65 gene prevents protein production which is required for the retinal tissue to absorb and process the light into vision. A normal RPE is injected in the gene therapy to restore the protein production. After two weeks, the patients can mostly view more clearly than they did before. Possible complications of gene therapy include sensitivity to light.
In spit that it is just a successful case of Leber's Congenital Amaurosis treatment, it gives hopes to other eye diseases originated from gene disorders. Researches concerned are under procession. The application of gene therapy in visual impairment will be a great success in the near future.
By: Mark Burnsy
In modern society where most people are educated, eyesight problems inevitably proliferate, due to the fact that they have spent more time in reading. TV and computers are also incentives of the skyrocketed eyesight problems. Owing to the invention of eyeglasses and contact lenses, people with nearsightedness, farsightedness, astigmatism and presbyopia are able to view a clear world as well. Additionally, fast developed, eyeglass manufactures achieve advancement in glare reduction and unwanted wavelengths of light elimination.
However, eyeglasses and contacts can not serve as helps for vision improvement of people suffering from eye diseases, such as Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Retinopathy. Recently, a medical treatment is developed, which is also able to treat visual impairments. Avastin is a drug that was originally used in Colo-rectal cancer treatments but is found to have an ability to improve the vision in patients with Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy and other vascular related retinal diseases. What's more, many other new drugs are brought about in succession as well, for example, the non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs can reduce retinal inflammation and cyst formations.
There are some people whose eye diseases arise from within the patients, genetic and congenital disorders. They pose a great challenge to eye doctors and surgeons. Luckily, gene therapy is found to be able to dramatically improve those patients' vision. The procedure is performed at the Scheie Eye Institute in Philadelphia and the patients formerly suffering from Leber's Congenital Amaurosis claim that he could read letters on an eye chart already after such a procedure. Then the news was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, on which the cause of Leber's Congenital Amaurosis and how the surgery achieves an success are recorded. It is stated that a lack of RPE 65 gene prevents protein production which is required for the retinal tissue to absorb and process the light into vision. A normal RPE is injected in the gene therapy to restore the protein production. After two weeks, the patients can mostly view more clearly than they did before. Possible complications of gene therapy include sensitivity to light.
In spit that it is just a successful case of Leber's Congenital Amaurosis treatment, it gives hopes to other eye diseases originated from gene disorders. Researches concerned are under procession. The application of gene therapy in visual impairment will be a great success in the near future.
Sunday, October 17, 2010
NeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
NeoVista, Inc. made public today at the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting the company’s one-year results from their MERITAGE Study. This study was designed to examine NeoVista’s novel Epimacular Brachytherapy procedure when used in patients who require chronic therapy with anti-VEGF agents on an ongoing basis to control Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Wet AMD). The study enrolled patients who had as many as 38 prior injections of anti-VEGF therapy before receiving Epimacular Brachytherapy. The study population had a trend toward losing vision, even with regular anti-VEGF therapy in the year prior to enrollment. Prior to entry into the study, all patients were required to have received a loading dose of 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections and then a minimum of 5 additional injections in the 12 months preceding enrollment or 3 injections in the 6 months preceding enrollment. This ensured that the full benefit of anti-VEGF therapy was realized prior to entry into the study.
Study results (n=53) to date suggest that a single procedure of Epimacular Brachytherapy can stabilize visual acuity in a majority of this patient population (79%) while decreasing the number of anti-VEGF injections required. Most importantly, 47% of patients enrolled in the study experienced some improvement in their visual acuity while 10% of patients gained 15 or more letters of visual acuity at 12 months. This improvement is significant in patients that have been receiving chronic anti-VEGF treatment with no vision improvement in the year prior to enrollment, as compared to all other trials that are treating patients with newly onset disease.
The study results also pointed to a favorable trend with respect to a reduced number of anti-VEGF injections following delivery of Epimacular Brachytherapy (mean of 3.9) versus the period of time leading up to Epimacular Brachytherapy intervention (mean of 12.3). In addition, 25% of patients remained injection-free at 12 months following the Epimacular Brachytherapy procedure.
“MERITAGE is the first of its kind study designed to evaluate the potential role of the NeoVista device in treating chronic disease and decreasing the burden of treatment while maintaining or improving visual acuity,” said John N. Hendrick, President and CEO of NeoVista. “Data from recent randomized trials suggest that most patients suffering from Neovascular AMD will require anti-VEGF treatment on an ongoing basis for an indefinite period of time. We are very excited that our procedure, Epimacular Brachytherapy, not only has the potential to significantly decrease the number of injections administered but may also improve visual acuity in a significant percentage of this patient population.”
In contrast to other forms of radiation therapy for Neovascular AMD, NeoVista’s approach delivers a focused dose of energy directly to the wet AMD lesion without damaging the adjacent healthy retinal vasculature. Utilizing strontium 90, the targeted energy is delivered to a an area up to 3 mm in depth and up to 5.4 mm in diameter. Importantly for patients, the systemic exposure to radiation is minimal and highly controlled to a local area. The effective dose to the entire body from NeoVista’s device is less than that from a typical chest x-ray. There were a limited number of adverse events in the trial, which were related to the surgical vitrectomy procedure, rather than Epimacular Brachytherapy.
The MERITAGE Study was conducted in two centers in the Unites States, one center in the United Kingdom, and two centers in Israel. Principal investigators were Pravin U. Dugel (USA), Michael D. Bennett (USA), Timothy L. Jackson (UK), Adiel Barack (Israel), and Dov Weinberger (Israel). The data was presented by Pravin Dugel, MD, managing partner, Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ. “The potential of this treatment is enormous,” said Dr. Dugel, “as this patient population represents the majority of patients that I see in my clinic each and every day. I believe that Epimacular Brachytherapy, unlike anti-VEGF therapy alone, offers a broad spectrum of activity and may therefore inhibit multiple disease processes involved in the pathology of wet AMD. To observe not only a reduction in treatment burden, but also an improvement in visual acuity in almost half of these difficult to treat patients at the one year mark is quite encouraging.”
NeoVista completed enrollment in the company’s first pivotal trial, CABERNET (CNV Secondary to AMD Treated with BEta RadiatioN Epiretinal Therapy). CABERNET is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study that has enrolled over 490 subjects at 45 sites worldwide, and is evaluating the safety and efficacy of NeoVista’s therapy delivered concomitantly with the FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapy Lucentis® (ranibizumab) versus Lucentis alone.
A second pivotal trial MERLOT (Macular EpiRetinal Brachytherapy versus Lucentis® Only Treatment), sponsored by King’s College Hospital, London, England, (Principal Investigator-Mr. Tim Jackson), is being conducted in 20 centers throughout the United Kingdom. MERLOT is also a randomized, controlled study, with targeted patient enrollment of 363 subjects. This study is analyzing the effects of Epimacular Brachytherapy used concomitantly with as needed Lucentis injections versus continued Lucentis therapy alone, in patients who require chronic therapy with anti-VEGF agents on an ongoing basis to control Wet AMD.
About NeoVista, Inc.
NeoVista, Inc. is a privately held medical device company based in Newark, California. The company’s first commercial product, VIDION® ANV® Therapy System, is cleared for commercial use in all markets that accept a CE Mark.
For more information about the company, or this novel therapy, please visit the company’s Web site at www.neovistainc.com.
# # #
Vocus©Copyright 1997-2010, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Movie: Twelve Kingdoms – Chapter 7 – Reflection http://bit.ly/9KqKJi – by kitanoau (Kitano Holdings P/L)
The Twelve Kingdoms episode 39-1 (Audio English) /45
The Twelve Kingdoms episode 39-1 (Audio English) /45
Related Posts:
* Horror Movie Freak Author Don Sumner Presents the Horror Movies to Watch Over the 10 Days to Halloween
* Freedom: A Novel (Oprah’s Book Club)
* Blood Thinner OK for Superficial Leg Clots: Study
* Monday’s local golf results
* Full Metal Panic! (novel) Volume 1: Fighting Boy Meets Girl
Tagged as: AgeRelated, Degeneration, Macular, Neovascular, NeoVista, novel, OneYear, presents..., results, Study, Therapy, Treatment
{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }
MrJustletmeseeit October 16, 2010 at 12:39 AM
@gr8Sweetfox Ok, what if we stuff the nuke with pixies and unicorns?
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 1:23 AM
@MrJustletmeseeit that wouldnt happen. at least the trees.. i mean this special trees are never affected.. they seem to be impossible to destroy
Reply
MrJustletmeseeit October 16, 2010 at 1:55 AM
@gr8Sweetfox what if the nuke slips thru and detonates while tentei is yawning? or getting it on with some hot goddess…
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 1:56 AM
@gr8Sweetfox As for your question about the princess’s palace song. I do not believe an official attempt of dubbing it into English was ever made. There might be fan made videos floating out there. I recommend you search the first line of the song’s lyrics for these. Good luck.
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 2:33 AM
@gr8Sweetfox 12 Kingdoms is very unique in that it is what I would like to call “a Fantasy Opera”, in which the characters are vivid and the central storyline lives within an epic world of continuous stories. This kind of anime are very hard sells because it requires the anime studios to invest heavily and risk utter failure. However, there are a few out there that are on similar caliber. One is Legend of Galactic Heroes. Unfortunately it is science fiction rather than fantasy.
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 3:00 AM
@RokenMusic something like 12 kingdoms with anime?
ps, you were fast. And maybe you know something about the english dubbed version of Sho something. You know that song about a doll… maybe you know something i want it in english so badly ugh i would even pay for it ;__;
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 3:29 AM
@gr8Sweetfox EVA: Neon Genesis Evangelion
LoGH: Legend of Galactic Heroes
Ronin Kenshin
Cowboy Bebop
Trigun
Black Lagoon
and the list goes on depending on your tastes.
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 3:58 AM
@RokenMusic ok , what is EVA, LoGH, and etc. ?
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 4:49 AM
@MrJustletmeseeit nah it would not. Tentei protects their world.
Reply
MrJustletmeseeit October 16, 2010 at 5:16 AM
man… one of todays nukes would take that whole world out =(((
Reply
maihoua19 October 16, 2010 at 6:01 AM
i always felt exciting watching this movie and love it
Reply
endlesssonata October 16, 2010 at 6:25 AM
I love all the Oooohhhh and Aaaahhhhh. So freaking cool!
Reply
endlesssonata October 16, 2010 at 6:55 AM
WOW this one is my favorite ep ever! Youko’s entre is soooo coolll. Now that IS how a queen reveal herself!
Reply
Goatmon October 16, 2010 at 7:43 AM
Youko is the boss, and she’s layin’ down the law.
Reply
Goatmon October 16, 2010 at 7:49 AM
@chebozz Fantasy/Adventure?
Reply
ZRaya99 October 16, 2010 at 8:27 AM
i like how they all laught
Reply
enariuzai October 16, 2010 at 8:51 AM
早く続きが観たいです、続編が再開されたみたいだし＾＾
Reply
afny19 October 16, 2010 at 9:11 AM
if the real world have ruler like this, this world can be a better place… so wise and noble even if that person use to be just a commoner ^^,
Reply
brokenating October 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM
i really love this episode! :D
Reply
zeroEDJE October 16, 2010 at 10:08 AM
For a second there I thought we were going to see the intro.
Reply
chebozz October 16, 2010 at 10:33 AM
hmmm…what is the genre of this anime??
Reply
mancdg627aol October 16, 2010 at 11:26 AM
I love watching this episode over and over again it’s so cool when keiki showed up and youko questioned general jinrai hahaha… The best anime i watched on its genre… I will buy the books an read it…. ^^
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 12:05 PM
@gabaroo59: No, not really. Twelve kingdoms is one of the best light novel series and anime series. Up there with EVA, LoGH, and etc.
I’m surprised that they didn’t do a half bad job at dubbing this anime. The translation is pretty accurate to the original. Although Yoko’s voice is supposed to be more boyish.
Reply
bollywoodgirl21 October 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM
I love yokos speach in the beginning, she just rules!!!
Reply
tearsangelz October 16, 2010 at 12:54 PM
i totally agree<3 all the beasts in this anime is just so awesome!
Reply
Cancel reply
Leave a Comment
Name *
E-mail *
Website
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
Previous post: “Hulk” the Incredible Guide
Next post: “I’ve Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!”: A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your Education
Recent Posts
*
Pokémon Apokélypse: Live Action Trailer HDPokémon Apokélypse: Live Action Trailer HD
Pokémon Apokélypse: Live Action Trailer… »
*
New York Comic Con: V, Vampire Diaries and Nikita Take ManhattanNew York Comic Con: V, Vampire Diaries and Nikita Take Manhattan
New York Comic Con: V, Vampire Diaries and Nikita Take Manhattan After a year and a half… »
*
Where can I find english dub episodes of sorcerous stabber orphen and MAR?Where can I find english dub episodes of sorcerous stabber orphen and MAR?
Question by hannahhannahhowhow: Where can I find english dub episodes of sorcerous stabber orphen and… »
*
Air Gear, Vol. 1Air Gear, Vol. 1
Air Gear, Vol. 1 ISBN13: 9780345492784Condition: NewNotes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one… »
*
Confirmed Speakers Announced for Exhibition and Convention Executives Forum (ECEF) 2011Confirmed Speakers Announced for Exhibition and Convention Executives Forum (ECEF) 2011
Confirmed Speakers Announced for Exhibition and Convention Executives Forum (ECEF) 2011 The… »
*
“I’ve Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!”: A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your Education“I’ve Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!”: A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your Education
"I've Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!": A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your… »
*
NeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationNeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
NeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related… »
Study results (n=53) to date suggest that a single procedure of Epimacular Brachytherapy can stabilize visual acuity in a majority of this patient population (79%) while decreasing the number of anti-VEGF injections required. Most importantly, 47% of patients enrolled in the study experienced some improvement in their visual acuity while 10% of patients gained 15 or more letters of visual acuity at 12 months. This improvement is significant in patients that have been receiving chronic anti-VEGF treatment with no vision improvement in the year prior to enrollment, as compared to all other trials that are treating patients with newly onset disease.
The study results also pointed to a favorable trend with respect to a reduced number of anti-VEGF injections following delivery of Epimacular Brachytherapy (mean of 3.9) versus the period of time leading up to Epimacular Brachytherapy intervention (mean of 12.3). In addition, 25% of patients remained injection-free at 12 months following the Epimacular Brachytherapy procedure.
“MERITAGE is the first of its kind study designed to evaluate the potential role of the NeoVista device in treating chronic disease and decreasing the burden of treatment while maintaining or improving visual acuity,” said John N. Hendrick, President and CEO of NeoVista. “Data from recent randomized trials suggest that most patients suffering from Neovascular AMD will require anti-VEGF treatment on an ongoing basis for an indefinite period of time. We are very excited that our procedure, Epimacular Brachytherapy, not only has the potential to significantly decrease the number of injections administered but may also improve visual acuity in a significant percentage of this patient population.”
In contrast to other forms of radiation therapy for Neovascular AMD, NeoVista’s approach delivers a focused dose of energy directly to the wet AMD lesion without damaging the adjacent healthy retinal vasculature. Utilizing strontium 90, the targeted energy is delivered to a an area up to 3 mm in depth and up to 5.4 mm in diameter. Importantly for patients, the systemic exposure to radiation is minimal and highly controlled to a local area. The effective dose to the entire body from NeoVista’s device is less than that from a typical chest x-ray. There were a limited number of adverse events in the trial, which were related to the surgical vitrectomy procedure, rather than Epimacular Brachytherapy.
The MERITAGE Study was conducted in two centers in the Unites States, one center in the United Kingdom, and two centers in Israel. Principal investigators were Pravin U. Dugel (USA), Michael D. Bennett (USA), Timothy L. Jackson (UK), Adiel Barack (Israel), and Dov Weinberger (Israel). The data was presented by Pravin Dugel, MD, managing partner, Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ. “The potential of this treatment is enormous,” said Dr. Dugel, “as this patient population represents the majority of patients that I see in my clinic each and every day. I believe that Epimacular Brachytherapy, unlike anti-VEGF therapy alone, offers a broad spectrum of activity and may therefore inhibit multiple disease processes involved in the pathology of wet AMD. To observe not only a reduction in treatment burden, but also an improvement in visual acuity in almost half of these difficult to treat patients at the one year mark is quite encouraging.”
NeoVista completed enrollment in the company’s first pivotal trial, CABERNET (CNV Secondary to AMD Treated with BEta RadiatioN Epiretinal Therapy). CABERNET is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study that has enrolled over 490 subjects at 45 sites worldwide, and is evaluating the safety and efficacy of NeoVista’s therapy delivered concomitantly with the FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapy Lucentis® (ranibizumab) versus Lucentis alone.
A second pivotal trial MERLOT (Macular EpiRetinal Brachytherapy versus Lucentis® Only Treatment), sponsored by King’s College Hospital, London, England, (Principal Investigator-Mr. Tim Jackson), is being conducted in 20 centers throughout the United Kingdom. MERLOT is also a randomized, controlled study, with targeted patient enrollment of 363 subjects. This study is analyzing the effects of Epimacular Brachytherapy used concomitantly with as needed Lucentis injections versus continued Lucentis therapy alone, in patients who require chronic therapy with anti-VEGF agents on an ongoing basis to control Wet AMD.
About NeoVista, Inc.
NeoVista, Inc. is a privately held medical device company based in Newark, California. The company’s first commercial product, VIDION® ANV® Therapy System, is cleared for commercial use in all markets that accept a CE Mark.
For more information about the company, or this novel therapy, please visit the company’s Web site at www.neovistainc.com.
# # #
Vocus©Copyright 1997-2010, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Movie: Twelve Kingdoms – Chapter 7 – Reflection http://bit.ly/9KqKJi – by kitanoau (Kitano Holdings P/L)
The Twelve Kingdoms episode 39-1 (Audio English) /45
The Twelve Kingdoms episode 39-1 (Audio English) /45
Related Posts:
* Horror Movie Freak Author Don Sumner Presents the Horror Movies to Watch Over the 10 Days to Halloween
* Freedom: A Novel (Oprah’s Book Club)
* Blood Thinner OK for Superficial Leg Clots: Study
* Monday’s local golf results
* Full Metal Panic! (novel) Volume 1: Fighting Boy Meets Girl
Tagged as: AgeRelated, Degeneration, Macular, Neovascular, NeoVista, novel, OneYear, presents..., results, Study, Therapy, Treatment
{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }
MrJustletmeseeit October 16, 2010 at 12:39 AM
@gr8Sweetfox Ok, what if we stuff the nuke with pixies and unicorns?
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 1:23 AM
@MrJustletmeseeit that wouldnt happen. at least the trees.. i mean this special trees are never affected.. they seem to be impossible to destroy
Reply
MrJustletmeseeit October 16, 2010 at 1:55 AM
@gr8Sweetfox what if the nuke slips thru and detonates while tentei is yawning? or getting it on with some hot goddess…
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 1:56 AM
@gr8Sweetfox As for your question about the princess’s palace song. I do not believe an official attempt of dubbing it into English was ever made. There might be fan made videos floating out there. I recommend you search the first line of the song’s lyrics for these. Good luck.
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 2:33 AM
@gr8Sweetfox 12 Kingdoms is very unique in that it is what I would like to call “a Fantasy Opera”, in which the characters are vivid and the central storyline lives within an epic world of continuous stories. This kind of anime are very hard sells because it requires the anime studios to invest heavily and risk utter failure. However, there are a few out there that are on similar caliber. One is Legend of Galactic Heroes. Unfortunately it is science fiction rather than fantasy.
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 3:00 AM
@RokenMusic something like 12 kingdoms with anime?
ps, you were fast. And maybe you know something about the english dubbed version of Sho something. You know that song about a doll… maybe you know something i want it in english so badly ugh i would even pay for it ;__;
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 3:29 AM
@gr8Sweetfox EVA: Neon Genesis Evangelion
LoGH: Legend of Galactic Heroes
Ronin Kenshin
Cowboy Bebop
Trigun
Black Lagoon
and the list goes on depending on your tastes.
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 3:58 AM
@RokenMusic ok , what is EVA, LoGH, and etc. ?
Reply
gr8Sweetfox October 16, 2010 at 4:49 AM
@MrJustletmeseeit nah it would not. Tentei protects their world.
Reply
MrJustletmeseeit October 16, 2010 at 5:16 AM
man… one of todays nukes would take that whole world out =(((
Reply
maihoua19 October 16, 2010 at 6:01 AM
i always felt exciting watching this movie and love it
Reply
endlesssonata October 16, 2010 at 6:25 AM
I love all the Oooohhhh and Aaaahhhhh. So freaking cool!
Reply
endlesssonata October 16, 2010 at 6:55 AM
WOW this one is my favorite ep ever! Youko’s entre is soooo coolll. Now that IS how a queen reveal herself!
Reply
Goatmon October 16, 2010 at 7:43 AM
Youko is the boss, and she’s layin’ down the law.
Reply
Goatmon October 16, 2010 at 7:49 AM
@chebozz Fantasy/Adventure?
Reply
ZRaya99 October 16, 2010 at 8:27 AM
i like how they all laught
Reply
enariuzai October 16, 2010 at 8:51 AM
早く続きが観たいです、続編が再開されたみたいだし＾＾
Reply
afny19 October 16, 2010 at 9:11 AM
if the real world have ruler like this, this world can be a better place… so wise and noble even if that person use to be just a commoner ^^,
Reply
brokenating October 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM
i really love this episode! :D
Reply
zeroEDJE October 16, 2010 at 10:08 AM
For a second there I thought we were going to see the intro.
Reply
chebozz October 16, 2010 at 10:33 AM
hmmm…what is the genre of this anime??
Reply
mancdg627aol October 16, 2010 at 11:26 AM
I love watching this episode over and over again it’s so cool when keiki showed up and youko questioned general jinrai hahaha… The best anime i watched on its genre… I will buy the books an read it…. ^^
Reply
RokenMusic October 16, 2010 at 12:05 PM
@gabaroo59: No, not really. Twelve kingdoms is one of the best light novel series and anime series. Up there with EVA, LoGH, and etc.
I’m surprised that they didn’t do a half bad job at dubbing this anime. The translation is pretty accurate to the original. Although Yoko’s voice is supposed to be more boyish.
Reply
bollywoodgirl21 October 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM
I love yokos speach in the beginning, she just rules!!!
Reply
tearsangelz October 16, 2010 at 12:54 PM
i totally agree<3 all the beasts in this anime is just so awesome!
Reply
Cancel reply
Leave a Comment
Name *
E-mail *
Website
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
Previous post: “Hulk” the Incredible Guide
Next post: “I’ve Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!”: A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your Education
Recent Posts
*
Pokémon Apokélypse: Live Action Trailer HDPokémon Apokélypse: Live Action Trailer HD
Pokémon Apokélypse: Live Action Trailer… »
*
New York Comic Con: V, Vampire Diaries and Nikita Take ManhattanNew York Comic Con: V, Vampire Diaries and Nikita Take Manhattan
New York Comic Con: V, Vampire Diaries and Nikita Take Manhattan After a year and a half… »
*
Where can I find english dub episodes of sorcerous stabber orphen and MAR?Where can I find english dub episodes of sorcerous stabber orphen and MAR?
Question by hannahhannahhowhow: Where can I find english dub episodes of sorcerous stabber orphen and… »
*
Air Gear, Vol. 1Air Gear, Vol. 1
Air Gear, Vol. 1 ISBN13: 9780345492784Condition: NewNotes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one… »
*
Confirmed Speakers Announced for Exhibition and Convention Executives Forum (ECEF) 2011Confirmed Speakers Announced for Exhibition and Convention Executives Forum (ECEF) 2011
Confirmed Speakers Announced for Exhibition and Convention Executives Forum (ECEF) 2011 The… »
*
“I’ve Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!”: A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your Education“I’ve Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!”: A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your Education
"I've Forgotten Everything I Learned in School!": A Refresher Course to Help You Reclaim Your… »
*
NeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationNeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
NeoVista Presents One-Year Study Results of Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related… »
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Zeaxanthin For Macular Degeneration Prevention and Treatment for Dry AMD
by Forrestal
Most ophthalmologists recommend the antioxidants lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is age related, commonly referred to as AMD. It is unusual for doctor’s to recommend nutritional supplements of any kind, unless a person has an outright deficiency, but AMD is a unique condition.
There are no effective treatments for one type of AMD (dry), but there are some partially effective treatments for wet AMD. Together, these two are the major causes of blindness in the elderly. The wet form is the most severe, if not treated early.
In wet AMD, blood vessels grow up and behind the retina, an area responsible for gathering light and transmitting signals to the brain, resulting in sight. The blood vessels often rupture and leak blood and protein below the macula, a very sensitive area within the retina.
Eventually, bleeding, leaking and scarring causes irreversible damage to the light receptors (rods and cones). Rapid vision loss is experienced if it is left untreated. Laser treatment and drugs that inhibit blood vessel growth are usually recommended.
Generally, doctors recommend lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is of the dry type. Dry AMD is much more common than wet. It is caused by a build up of yellow deposits called drusen on the retina.
In nature lutein and zeaxanthin are pigments or colors. They are normally present in the retina, with zeaxanthin being concentrated in the macula and lutein more highly concentrated in the periphery of the retina. There roles within the eye are not well understood, but they seem to help reduce or prevent the build up of drusen.
Drusen is similar in composition to the deposits that are found in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients and the plaque that is present in atherosclerosis. People with either of those two conditions have a higher risk of developing dry AMD.
Some doctors recommend taking lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention, particularly to their patients that have a family history of the disease. But, since the drusen are similar to the deposits that cause Alzheimer’s and heart disease, other antioxidants may be beneficial, as well.
Curcumin, an antioxidant present in the spice turmeric, is currently being studied for its benefit in Alzheimer’s disease. Not only does it prevent the accumulation of the plaque, it breaks it up. It might be able to break up the drusen in AMD, too.
One study indicates that the ideal combination of nutrients is omega 3 fatty acids, beta carotene, vitamin E, lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration. Omega 3 fatty acids, particularly DHA, are the most abundant fatty acids present in the retina. Beta-carotene is converted by the body to vitamin A, which is essential for good vision. Vitamin E is well-known for its antioxidant activity.
Prevention is worth a pound of cure, they say. In order to prevent AMD, people should lower their total fat intake, and increase their nutrient intake. This may help reduce the risk of many other diseases, as well. Taking zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention is a good idea. Taking a multi-nutritional supplement that contains it, is a great one.
Most ophthalmologists recommend the antioxidants lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is age related, commonly referred to as AMD. It is unusual for doctor’s to recommend nutritional supplements of any kind, unless a person has an outright deficiency, but AMD is a unique condition.
There are no effective treatments for one type of AMD (dry), but there are some partially effective treatments for wet AMD. Together, these two are the major causes of blindness in the elderly. The wet form is the most severe, if not treated early.
In wet AMD, blood vessels grow up and behind the retina, an area responsible for gathering light and transmitting signals to the brain, resulting in sight. The blood vessels often rupture and leak blood and protein below the macula, a very sensitive area within the retina.
Eventually, bleeding, leaking and scarring causes irreversible damage to the light receptors (rods and cones). Rapid vision loss is experienced if it is left untreated. Laser treatment and drugs that inhibit blood vessel growth are usually recommended.
Generally, doctors recommend lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration that is of the dry type. Dry AMD is much more common than wet. It is caused by a build up of yellow deposits called drusen on the retina.
In nature lutein and zeaxanthin are pigments or colors. They are normally present in the retina, with zeaxanthin being concentrated in the macula and lutein more highly concentrated in the periphery of the retina. There roles within the eye are not well understood, but they seem to help reduce or prevent the build up of drusen.
Drusen is similar in composition to the deposits that are found in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients and the plaque that is present in atherosclerosis. People with either of those two conditions have a higher risk of developing dry AMD.
Some doctors recommend taking lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention, particularly to their patients that have a family history of the disease. But, since the drusen are similar to the deposits that cause Alzheimer’s and heart disease, other antioxidants may be beneficial, as well.
Curcumin, an antioxidant present in the spice turmeric, is currently being studied for its benefit in Alzheimer’s disease. Not only does it prevent the accumulation of the plaque, it breaks it up. It might be able to break up the drusen in AMD, too.
One study indicates that the ideal combination of nutrients is omega 3 fatty acids, beta carotene, vitamin E, lutein and zeaxanthin for macular degeneration. Omega 3 fatty acids, particularly DHA, are the most abundant fatty acids present in the retina. Beta-carotene is converted by the body to vitamin A, which is essential for good vision. Vitamin E is well-known for its antioxidant activity.
Prevention is worth a pound of cure, they say. In order to prevent AMD, people should lower their total fat intake, and increase their nutrient intake. This may help reduce the risk of many other diseases, as well. Taking zeaxanthin for macular degeneration prevention is a good idea. Taking a multi-nutritional supplement that contains it, is a great one.
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Advanced Cell Technology Obtains Broad Patent covering use of Stem Cell
Sep 14, 2010 by Advanced Cell Techno;ogy
Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. ("ACT"; OTCBB: ACTC), a leader in the field of regenerative medicine, announced today that it will be issued U.S. Patent Numbers 7,795,025 and 7,794,704 on Tuesday, September 14th, which continue to extend the company's patent portfolio covering its retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell programs. In particular, the claims that will issue in patent number 7,794,704 broadly cover methods for treating retinal degeneration using human RPE cells differentiated from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Issuing with 68 claims, this patent covers methods of treatment with hESC-derived RPE cells that includes, but is not limited to, Stargardt's disease, retinitis pigmentosa, and macular degeneration. The 41 claims issuing in US Patent 7,795,025 contribute to the development of the company's protection of the processes for manufacturing RPE cells from human ES cells. The patent covers fundamental methods for generating transplantable cells for treatment of human patients.
"Another wonderful milestone for ACT! These patents continue the recognition of the inventions and innovations resulting from our scientific team's ongoing research, and further protects the platform technology underlying our RPE program, one of our key therapeutic programs," said William M. Caldwell IV, ACT's Chairman and CEO. "A valuable addition to our strong intellectual property portfolio, these patents should help position ACT as the dominant player in this potentially very large market. Our RPE technology is safe and scalable, and has tremendous potential for treating some 200 or more diseases of the retina."
"ACT is developing first-in-class treatments for degenerative disorders of the retina," said Robert Lanza, M.D., ACT's Chief Scientific Officer. "The use of RPE cells created from human embryonic stem cells should open the door to potential treatments for many diseases of the retina that impact sight. According to the World Health Organization, macular degeneration alone is known to affect 30-40 million people worldwide, and this represents only a handful of the 200 diseases that may be treated using our RPE cells. We have worked hard to develop an efficient method for producing a renewable source of transplantable RPE cells that can be used to target diseases such as Stargardt's Disease and Age-related Macular Degeneration. For many of these patients there are no available treatments. We have demonstrated that our stem cell-derived RPE cells can rescue visual function in animals that otherwise would have gone blind. We are looking forward to starting our clinical trials with the hope that these cells will be similarly efficacious in patients."
"We believe that these patents are especially important as they extend the company's patent coverage of the scalable manufacturing of human RPE cells for therapeutic use, which are core to our technology and product portfolio," continued Mr. Caldwell. "This IP further expands our patent estate with respect to protecting the use of RPE cells in a wide range of treatments, offering additional validation of the strength and breadth of our patent portfolio. This development also dovetails nicely with the prospect of initiating our human clinical trial for our RPE program. We are optimistic that the methods-of-treatments and the culturing processes covered by these two new patents, along with the Company's proprietary detection technique for final product release, will establish a formidable barrier to entry for any potential competitors. Once we have begun to treat Stargardt patients, we plan to initiate another clinical trial relating to the use of RPE cells in the treatment of dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). At present there is no approved treatment for dry AMD, despite the fact that it represents a $20-30 billion potential market."
ACT's Single Blastomere technology used for isolating hESCs does not require the destruction of embryos. The RPE and other hESC-derived cells the company intends to produce for clinical use all begin with these "embryo-safe" stem cells. ACT does not rely on government funding for any of its research or development efforts, and accordingly has not been impacted by the recent court injunction against federal funding of hESC research. Nevertheless, the company's hESC lines and cells made for those lines (such as RPE cells) should fall outside the scope of the court order. While the injunction has been stayed, it is widely believed that this is only a temporary reprieve, with a permanent injunction a real possibility perhaps as early as the end of this month. Should that come to pass, ACT stands ready to offer its human stem cell lines to the research community, pending their approval by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
About Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.
Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. is a biotechnology company applying cellular technology in the field of regenerative medicine. For more information, visit http://www.advancedcell.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this news release regarding future financial and operating results, future growth in research and development programs, potential applications of our technology, opportunities for the company and any other statements about the future expectations, beliefs, goals, plans, or prospects expressed by management constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact (including statements containing the words "will," "believes," "plans," "anticipates," "broad," "expects," "estimates," and similar expressions) should also be considered to be forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including: limited operating history, need for future capital, risks inherent in the development and commercialization of potential products, scope and enforceability of our intellectual property, and economic conditions generally. Additional information on potential factors that could affect our results and other risks and uncertainties are detailed from time to time in the company's periodic reports, including the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, opinions, and expectations of the company's management at the time they are made, and the company does not assume any obligation to update its forward-looking statements if those beliefs, opinions, expectations, or other circumstances should change. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, opinions, and expectations of the company's management at the time they are made, and the company does not assume any obligation to update its forward-looking statements if those beliefs, opinions, expectations, or other circumstances should change.
Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. ("ACT"; OTCBB: ACTC), a leader in the field of regenerative medicine, announced today that it will be issued U.S. Patent Numbers 7,795,025 and 7,794,704 on Tuesday, September 14th, which continue to extend the company's patent portfolio covering its retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell programs. In particular, the claims that will issue in patent number 7,794,704 broadly cover methods for treating retinal degeneration using human RPE cells differentiated from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Issuing with 68 claims, this patent covers methods of treatment with hESC-derived RPE cells that includes, but is not limited to, Stargardt's disease, retinitis pigmentosa, and macular degeneration. The 41 claims issuing in US Patent 7,795,025 contribute to the development of the company's protection of the processes for manufacturing RPE cells from human ES cells. The patent covers fundamental methods for generating transplantable cells for treatment of human patients.
"Another wonderful milestone for ACT! These patents continue the recognition of the inventions and innovations resulting from our scientific team's ongoing research, and further protects the platform technology underlying our RPE program, one of our key therapeutic programs," said William M. Caldwell IV, ACT's Chairman and CEO. "A valuable addition to our strong intellectual property portfolio, these patents should help position ACT as the dominant player in this potentially very large market. Our RPE technology is safe and scalable, and has tremendous potential for treating some 200 or more diseases of the retina."
"ACT is developing first-in-class treatments for degenerative disorders of the retina," said Robert Lanza, M.D., ACT's Chief Scientific Officer. "The use of RPE cells created from human embryonic stem cells should open the door to potential treatments for many diseases of the retina that impact sight. According to the World Health Organization, macular degeneration alone is known to affect 30-40 million people worldwide, and this represents only a handful of the 200 diseases that may be treated using our RPE cells. We have worked hard to develop an efficient method for producing a renewable source of transplantable RPE cells that can be used to target diseases such as Stargardt's Disease and Age-related Macular Degeneration. For many of these patients there are no available treatments. We have demonstrated that our stem cell-derived RPE cells can rescue visual function in animals that otherwise would have gone blind. We are looking forward to starting our clinical trials with the hope that these cells will be similarly efficacious in patients."
"We believe that these patents are especially important as they extend the company's patent coverage of the scalable manufacturing of human RPE cells for therapeutic use, which are core to our technology and product portfolio," continued Mr. Caldwell. "This IP further expands our patent estate with respect to protecting the use of RPE cells in a wide range of treatments, offering additional validation of the strength and breadth of our patent portfolio. This development also dovetails nicely with the prospect of initiating our human clinical trial for our RPE program. We are optimistic that the methods-of-treatments and the culturing processes covered by these two new patents, along with the Company's proprietary detection technique for final product release, will establish a formidable barrier to entry for any potential competitors. Once we have begun to treat Stargardt patients, we plan to initiate another clinical trial relating to the use of RPE cells in the treatment of dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). At present there is no approved treatment for dry AMD, despite the fact that it represents a $20-30 billion potential market."
ACT's Single Blastomere technology used for isolating hESCs does not require the destruction of embryos. The RPE and other hESC-derived cells the company intends to produce for clinical use all begin with these "embryo-safe" stem cells. ACT does not rely on government funding for any of its research or development efforts, and accordingly has not been impacted by the recent court injunction against federal funding of hESC research. Nevertheless, the company's hESC lines and cells made for those lines (such as RPE cells) should fall outside the scope of the court order. While the injunction has been stayed, it is widely believed that this is only a temporary reprieve, with a permanent injunction a real possibility perhaps as early as the end of this month. Should that come to pass, ACT stands ready to offer its human stem cell lines to the research community, pending their approval by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
About Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.
Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. is a biotechnology company applying cellular technology in the field of regenerative medicine. For more information, visit http://www.advancedcell.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this news release regarding future financial and operating results, future growth in research and development programs, potential applications of our technology, opportunities for the company and any other statements about the future expectations, beliefs, goals, plans, or prospects expressed by management constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact (including statements containing the words "will," "believes," "plans," "anticipates," "broad," "expects," "estimates," and similar expressions) should also be considered to be forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including: limited operating history, need for future capital, risks inherent in the development and commercialization of potential products, scope and enforceability of our intellectual property, and economic conditions generally. Additional information on potential factors that could affect our results and other risks and uncertainties are detailed from time to time in the company's periodic reports, including the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, opinions, and expectations of the company's management at the time they are made, and the company does not assume any obligation to update its forward-looking statements if those beliefs, opinions, expectations, or other circumstances should change. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, opinions, and expectations of the company's management at the time they are made, and the company does not assume any obligation to update its forward-looking statements if those beliefs, opinions, expectations, or other circumstances should change.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
How to prevent age-related macular degeneration
by Dr Pandula Siribaddana
Age Related Macular Degeneration or ARMD is a common condition seen in the elderly population and can be named as one of the commonest causes of visual loss among the same age group. The condition is characterized by the gradual loss of central vision and could be recognized as having two major categories.
In one form, which is the ‘dry’ macular degeneration, the retina and the layer below in the back of the eye would be separated by cellular debris and in the second form, which is the ‘wet’ macular degeneration, the two layers will be separated by enlarging blood vessels under the retina. In both instances, the peripheral vision would be spared and therefore, these individuals would be able to carry out their daily activities, although the functions such as reading would be impaired to a significant extent.
How to prevent ARMD in the elderly?
The prevention strategies related to ARMD would include avoiding the risk factors which would cause the condition in the first place. Therefore, following prevention strategies can be named as the most useful in order to achieve better vision in the elderly age.
Control blood sugar levels
This has shown to have an influence in the manifestation of macular degeneration and since it is prevalent abundantly, adhering to good glycaemic control would be essential to reduce the disease burden of ARMD.
Avoid smoking
Among the many influences it makes on health, macular degeneration is one and therefore its avoidance would greatly help susceptible individuals to maintain better visual health. According to statistics, there seems to be a threefold risk among the smokers than in non-smokers to develop ARMD during the elderly life.
Control hypertension and cardiovascular diseases
Researchers have identified these two as influencing the occurrence of macular degeneration and controlling of the same would reduce the risk of ARMD in susceptible individuals.
Avoid direct sun light
Sun light, particularly the blue light in the sun’s rays, have shown to influence the functioning of the retina and thus can lead to the development of ARMD. Therefore, using special eye glasses and avoiding such exposure would be recommended for people whom are constantly at risk of being exposed.
Include carotenes in the diet
Carotenes containing foods or else supplements have shown to be effective to a certain extent in reducing the risk of macular degeneration and therefore steps should be taken to include such foods and to take a balanced diet as much as possible.
Add omega 3 fatty acids
Similar to carotenes, omega 3 fatty acids are suggested as being supportive in the prevention of ARMD and should be included in the diets of all ages.
Lastly, due to the fact that there are other factors which are not modifiable and may lead to the development of ARMD, it is always best to screen and initiate treatment as early as possible in order to prevent progression of the disease and to avoid the occurrence of complete blindness.
Age Related Macular Degeneration or ARMD is a common condition seen in the elderly population and can be named as one of the commonest causes of visual loss among the same age group. The condition is characterized by the gradual loss of central vision and could be recognized as having two major categories.
In one form, which is the ‘dry’ macular degeneration, the retina and the layer below in the back of the eye would be separated by cellular debris and in the second form, which is the ‘wet’ macular degeneration, the two layers will be separated by enlarging blood vessels under the retina. In both instances, the peripheral vision would be spared and therefore, these individuals would be able to carry out their daily activities, although the functions such as reading would be impaired to a significant extent.
How to prevent ARMD in the elderly?
The prevention strategies related to ARMD would include avoiding the risk factors which would cause the condition in the first place. Therefore, following prevention strategies can be named as the most useful in order to achieve better vision in the elderly age.
Control blood sugar levels
This has shown to have an influence in the manifestation of macular degeneration and since it is prevalent abundantly, adhering to good glycaemic control would be essential to reduce the disease burden of ARMD.
Avoid smoking
Among the many influences it makes on health, macular degeneration is one and therefore its avoidance would greatly help susceptible individuals to maintain better visual health. According to statistics, there seems to be a threefold risk among the smokers than in non-smokers to develop ARMD during the elderly life.
Control hypertension and cardiovascular diseases
Researchers have identified these two as influencing the occurrence of macular degeneration and controlling of the same would reduce the risk of ARMD in susceptible individuals.
Avoid direct sun light
Sun light, particularly the blue light in the sun’s rays, have shown to influence the functioning of the retina and thus can lead to the development of ARMD. Therefore, using special eye glasses and avoiding such exposure would be recommended for people whom are constantly at risk of being exposed.
Include carotenes in the diet
Carotenes containing foods or else supplements have shown to be effective to a certain extent in reducing the risk of macular degeneration and therefore steps should be taken to include such foods and to take a balanced diet as much as possible.
Add omega 3 fatty acids
Similar to carotenes, omega 3 fatty acids are suggested as being supportive in the prevention of ARMD and should be included in the diets of all ages.
Lastly, due to the fact that there are other factors which are not modifiable and may lead to the development of ARMD, it is always best to screen and initiate treatment as early as possible in order to prevent progression of the disease and to avoid the occurrence of complete blindness.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Limited Retinal Translocation for Wet Macular Degeneration
by Samantha Power
August 31st, 2010
Limited Retinal Translocation-Limited retinal translocation is another treatment aimed at wet macular degeneration. In this procedure the retina is actually moved somewhat to allow laser treatments to be applied more successfully to abnormal blood vessel growth. The procedure is still in the macular degeneration treatments developmental stages in terms of approval for commercial applications. Surgical options for dry macular degeneration are proposed periodically. The methodologies change from procedure to procedure, but the general idea is the same.
August 31st, 2010
Limited Retinal Translocation-Limited retinal translocation is another treatment aimed at wet macular degeneration. In this procedure the retina is actually moved somewhat to allow laser treatments to be applied more successfully to abnormal blood vessel growth. The procedure is still in the macular degeneration treatments developmental stages in terms of approval for commercial applications. Surgical options for dry macular degeneration are proposed periodically. The methodologies change from procedure to procedure, but the general idea is the same.
Monday, August 23, 2010
Macular Degeneration Surgery
By Joven Villanueva
While the quest in searching for the cure of macular degeneration is on going. Many national eye centers are investigating new ways to treat the said illness. There are different options in managing macular degeneration as the illness has two types. The wet form which usually results to loss of vision due to no reliable treatment yet to be developed and the dry form accounting 90% of cases can still be managed and controlled if diagnosed at an early stage and by eating the right food rich in vitamins A, C, E and other supplements such as zeaxanthine and zinc - proven to be effective in slowing down the disease
Here are some optional treatments available for patients having the wet form of macular degeneration. First is Photodynamic therapy which uses a combination of both cold laser and light-sensitive drug destroying abnormal blood vessels as the drug travels to the unwanted vessels after it was injected from the arm. Another option is Laser therapy where high energy lights are used to destroy abnormal growing blood vessels.
The Cole eye institute is conducting experimental treatments such as a surgery to remove abnormal blood vessels and blood. A genetically engineered enzyme is used by the surgeon to dissolve blood clots under the macula. Another procedure is called Macular translocation.This is performed using a laser therapy to treat abnormal blood vessel. To prevent the formation of scar tissue and damage to retina, the surgeon rotates the retina in a healthy area.
The healing process may take three to six weeks. The doctor may request for an angiogram after the macular surgery to make sure that there are no additional blood leakage in the area. An additional laser treatment maybe performed if a problem was observed.
Macular degeneration is a medical condition resulting to loss of vision making it difficult to read and recognize faces. To better understand the patient's condition, print out some letters six inches high and try to identify them while looking it at straight ahead. Hold the paper slightly to the side. This visual impairment does not lead to total blindness and in most cases some vision remains.
This disease mostly affects older and adults 50 years old and above. In a recent study for macular degeneration it was found out that those patients aging sixty six to seventy four suffer from this illness. Mostly women are prone to macular degeneration compare to men and smokers of any gender are also part of the growing list as tobacco increase the risk in three folds due to the toxic effects in retina. It is even 50% risky for those who have relatives with muscular degeneration to develop the illness compare to those who doesn't have with only 12% probability. Caucasians are more prone to develop macular degeneration compare to other races.
Other than age and family history, there are factors that cause macular degeneration. These includes hypertension or commonly known as high blood pressure, obesity, and high fat intake.
Ophthalmologists diagnose macular degeneration by looking at the abnormal vessels under the retina. A dye is injected in the arm of the patient where pictures are taken by a special camera until it reaches the eye. Any changes in the retina as shown from the photographs taken will serve as a guide for treatment.
While the quest in searching for the cure of macular degeneration is on going. Many national eye centers are investigating new ways to treat the said illness. There are different options in managing macular degeneration as the illness has two types. The wet form which usually results to loss of vision due to no reliable treatment yet to be developed and the dry form accounting 90% of cases can still be managed and controlled if diagnosed at an early stage and by eating the right food rich in vitamins A, C, E and other supplements such as zeaxanthine and zinc - proven to be effective in slowing down the disease
Here are some optional treatments available for patients having the wet form of macular degeneration. First is Photodynamic therapy which uses a combination of both cold laser and light-sensitive drug destroying abnormal blood vessels as the drug travels to the unwanted vessels after it was injected from the arm. Another option is Laser therapy where high energy lights are used to destroy abnormal growing blood vessels.
The Cole eye institute is conducting experimental treatments such as a surgery to remove abnormal blood vessels and blood. A genetically engineered enzyme is used by the surgeon to dissolve blood clots under the macula. Another procedure is called Macular translocation.This is performed using a laser therapy to treat abnormal blood vessel. To prevent the formation of scar tissue and damage to retina, the surgeon rotates the retina in a healthy area.
The healing process may take three to six weeks. The doctor may request for an angiogram after the macular surgery to make sure that there are no additional blood leakage in the area. An additional laser treatment maybe performed if a problem was observed.
Macular degeneration is a medical condition resulting to loss of vision making it difficult to read and recognize faces. To better understand the patient's condition, print out some letters six inches high and try to identify them while looking it at straight ahead. Hold the paper slightly to the side. This visual impairment does not lead to total blindness and in most cases some vision remains.
This disease mostly affects older and adults 50 years old and above. In a recent study for macular degeneration it was found out that those patients aging sixty six to seventy four suffer from this illness. Mostly women are prone to macular degeneration compare to men and smokers of any gender are also part of the growing list as tobacco increase the risk in three folds due to the toxic effects in retina. It is even 50% risky for those who have relatives with muscular degeneration to develop the illness compare to those who doesn't have with only 12% probability. Caucasians are more prone to develop macular degeneration compare to other races.
Other than age and family history, there are factors that cause macular degeneration. These includes hypertension or commonly known as high blood pressure, obesity, and high fat intake.
Ophthalmologists diagnose macular degeneration by looking at the abnormal vessels under the retina. A dye is injected in the arm of the patient where pictures are taken by a special camera until it reaches the eye. Any changes in the retina as shown from the photographs taken will serve as a guide for treatment.
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Epidemiolgy and Burden of Retina Disease
By Nancy M. Holekamp, MD
Age-related macular degeneration. The Eye Disease Prevalence Group has estimated that 1.75 million people in the United States have advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD), including neovascular AMD or geographic atrophy, but not necessarily involving the foveal center, with the highest prevalence in adults older than 80 years of age.1 These numbers are estimated to increase substantially in the coming decades.
The numbers are huge, but what impact does AMD have on our patients? AMD is associated with an increased incidence of depression, mortality, and a greater need for assistance for daily tasks. In a quality-oflife study that was part of the Submacular Surgery Trials (SSTs), patients were asked to rate their current vision during phone interviews. Patient scores were converted to a preference value scale ranging from 1 (perfect health with perfect vision) to 0 (death). A mean preference value of 0.64 for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) suggests a profound impact on quality of life. The impact is reported as greatest in those with the most severe loss of vision, but even patients with visual acuity of at least 20/40 in one eye had relatively low preference values.2 This is striking because it is right between having chronic renal failure and symptomatic HIV/AIDS (Figure 1). Clearly, AMD has a significant impact on the quality of life of individuals.
Diabetic retinopathy. It is well known that we are in the midst of an epidemic of obesity and diabetes in the United States. The rates of both have increased dramatically from 1990 to 2001, particularly in the southeast (Figure 2) and the increase in people with diabetes directly correlates to the rise in obesity.3 An estimated 18.2 million people had diabetes in the United States in 20023 and diabetes has been estimated to affect 151 million people worldwide, and is projected to increase to 324 million by 2025.4 It is also estimated that 35% of any diabetic population will have diabetic retinopathy.5 We know this from the Beaver Dam Eye Study. In terms of costs, the direct and indirect costs for diabetes were estimated at $132 billion in 2002.6 Almost $1 out of every $5 in the United States spent on healthcare is for patients with diabetes. Diabetes has an enormous impact on patients’ quality of life and represents a large economic issue.
Retinal vein occlusion. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal disease after diabetic retinopathy. The Beaver Dam Study reported a prevalence of 0.6% in patients older than 43 years and the same study reported a 15-year cumulative incidence of BRVO of 1.8%.7 Although these numbers may sound low, the average age of these patients is 65 and this age group may have a host of comorbidities (eg, hypertension, vascular disease, diabetes). RVOs share risk factors with myocardial infarction (MI),8 stroke, and other arterial thrombotic events.9 In a study that is currently in press,10 we reviewed the records of 4,500 patients with RVO and compared them with 13,500 patients who were age-matched controls. We found that patients with RVO had significantly higher likelihood of having angina, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, diabetes, heart disease, MI or stroke, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension (P=.001) The incidence of RVOs continues to increase as the incidence of diabetes increases and the population ages.
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
Evidence-based medicine is the practice of medicine based on the best scientific data available. The questions are, “How much evidence do you need?” and “How much science is behind it?”
These are the various levels of evidence. The weakest is the single-case report, which is level 5 evidence. The second weakest is the case series without a comparison group (level 4). Level 3 evidence consists of nonrandomized clinical trials that may compare two groups that are not concurrent or randomized. A level 2 clinical trial is similar to a phase 2 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical trial—it is randomized and controlled but it has a high type-1 error, where a trend is apparent and may be significant, but the number of patients is insufficient. A type-2 error is when a treatment difference likely exists but, again, there are not enough patients to isolate the difference.
Level 1 evidence is from randomized, prospective, controlled trials, with a low type-1 and type-2 errors. These are the phase 3 clinical trials that eventually lead to drug approval by the FDA. The key to level 1 evidence is a well-designed study and a large number of patients.
CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN: WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?
In medicine we prefer level 1 trials because of random assignment to treatment or control; the concurrent enrollment that ensures patients are being treated in a similar manner; the large numbers of patients; and the masking of the investigators. The standardized follow up is also important to the significance of outcomes. By controlling these variables, we are able to clinically treat patients in the most scientific manner. My colleague Kuldev Singh, MD, who is a glaucoma specialist has said, “This term [randomized, controlled] allows the investigator to disarm the novice scientific critic, while impugning lesser prospective and all retrospective studies, not to mention case series and reports.” The randomized, controlled study is at the top of the food chain.
A case example of using low-level evidence-based medicine upon which to base treatment decisions is that of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) for treating AMD. In August 2005, there was one case report (level 5 evidence) demonstrating improvement on optical coherence tomography (OCT) for a patient nonresponsive to pegaptanib sodium (Macugen, Eyetech/Pfizer) for AMD in the published literature.11 Simultaneously, Philip Rosenfeld, MD, PhD, one of the authors of the aforementioned case report, presented a paper (level 4 evidence) at the American Society of Retina Specialists in Montreal on a series of patients with exudative AMD who benefited from intravitreal bevacizumab. Clearly, the “bevacizumab for AMD” era was ushered in using the least convincing type of evidence.
Unlike bevacizumab, ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) was subject to two phase 3 randomized, controlled clinical trials sponsored by industry (MARINA ANCHOR) that resulted in FDA approval. The extent to which the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab has been scrutinized is to the highest level.
But can you have a randomized, controlled trial for every disease and treatment? Paul Lichter, MD, said, “Authors of case reports, retrospective studies, and other manuscripts covering the gamut of imperfect clinical projects often conclude their papers by calling for a randomized, controlled, collaborative clinical trial. While I have no idea how many times such statements are made, there is no question that these pronouncements are abundantly more frequent then the clinical trials that result from them.”
CRITERIA FOR CONDUCTING A LEVEL 1 CLINICAL TRIAL
Clearly, a level 1 clinical trial cannot be conducted for every clinical situation. My four criteria for conducting a randomized, controlled clinical trial include the following:
* The disease must represent a significant health problem. An example of what can be called an questionable effort is in 1993 when the Canadian Ophthalmology Study Group conducted a multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the argon green vs krypton red laser for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in AMD.12 The comparison of these lasers was not a burning issue for the health care system.
* There must be scientific plausibility of benefit. In other words, there has to be some biologic basis for believing that a treatment works. An example from the AMD literature is subfoveal laser for CNV.13 There was no basis to suggest that applying laser to a patient’s fovea would be beneficial.
* A plausible, biologic benefit must exist. In other words, the early data on a new treatment should suggest the possibility of benefit. A good example of this is the Submacular Surgery Trials in AMD where early pilot data did not show any benefit to submacular surgery over laser photocoagulation.14 The eventual the long-term data supported this conclusion.
* Sufficient numbers of patients must be enrolled. If a study cannot recruit enough patients, it will not succeed. For example, it was almost impossible to recruit patients into the Macular Translocation clinical trial because they were randomized to either photodynamic therapy—a relatively painless 15-minute office-based laser procedure— or to macular translocation, which had a 25% complication rate at the time they were trying to enroll.15
The clinical trials’ registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov, currently lists 530 clinical trials for the treatment of AMD. Of those 200 trials are open and actively recruiting patients. Eighty-seven of these are randomized and controlled. Those of us in the field of ophthalmology and the subspecialty of retina are fortunate to be part of a profession that is committed to providing the best scientific evidence for its members. We have a long, proud history of practicing evidence-based medicine and performing randomized clinical trials in our field.
NON-INFERIOR CLINICAL TRIALS
There are basically three types of trial design: superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority. The Comparisons of Age- Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) is a non-inferiority trial comparing intravitreal ranibizumab to intravitreal bevacizumab. The margin of non-inferiority must be pre-specified in the design protocol to construct a two-sided, 95% confidence interval (CI) to determine the true difference between the agents. To be able to declare bevacizumab non-inferior, that interval must lay entirely on the positive side of the non-inferior margin.
Figure 3 helps illustrate how the results of a non-inferiority trial are interpreted. Applied to the CATT, if proved non-inferior, bevacizumab is either almost as good as, equivalent to, or better than ranibizumab. If bevacizumab fails non-inferiority then it is either equivalent, almost as good as, or inferior to ranibizumab. All of those possibilities exist.
The major criteria for non-inferiority clinical trials are:
1) historical evidence that the reference drug works (ie, MARINA and ANCHOR);
2) trial design must be the same as the reference trial (ie, the CATT has same design as MARINA and ANCHOR);
3) trial conduct must be the same (ie, many of the clinical sites from MARINA and ANCHOR are also sites for the CATT);
4) the non-inferior margin (minus delta) must be acceptable (ie, six letters for the CATT).
In addition to the CATT, there are two other non-inferiority trials in AMD: HARBOR (A Study of Ranibizumab Administered Monthly or on an As-Needed Basis in Patients With Subfoveal Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration) and VIEW I (VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD). These are both similar to MARINA and ANCHOR in historical evidence, trial design and trial conduct, and have an acceptable non-inferior margin.
SUMMARY
The best way to practice evidence-based medicine is with phase 3, randomized, and controlled trials. The requirements for level 1 clinical trials do not necessarily constitute a “cookbook” for successful trials; rather, they provide guidelines for those who are designing and participating in clinical trials.
Finally, evidence alone is never sufficient information to make a clinical decision—there are many factors to be taken under consideration. When treating our patients, we consider several factors including a patient’s values, socio-economic status, and age; however we should rely on three main components: our years of clinical experience, the patient’s particular circumstances, and what we have learned from evidence-based medicine.
1. Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Muñoz B, et al; The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2004;122:564-572.
2. No authors listed. Submacular surgery trials randomized pilot trial of laser photocoagulation versus surgery for recurrent choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: II. Quality of life outcomes submacular surgery trials pilot study report number 2. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):408-418.
3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States. Bethesda, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2003.
4. King H, Rewers M. Global estimates for prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in adults: WHO Ad Hoc Diabetes Reporting Group. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:157–177.
5. Beaver Dam Eye Study.
6. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917-932.
7. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Linton KL. Beaver Dam Eye Study. Retinopathy in adults with newly discovered and previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(1):58-62.
8. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Heart attack. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/Diseases/HeartAttack/HeartAttack_WhatIs.html.
9. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Committee. Circulation. 2006;113:85-151.
10. Holekamp N. Arch Ophthalmol. In press.
11. Rosenfeld PJ, Moshfeghi AA, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36(4):331-335.
12. The Canadian Ophthalmology Study Group. Argon green vs krypton red laser photocoagulation of extrafoveal choroidal neovascular lesions. One-year results in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:181-185.
13. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Visual outcome after laser photo- coagulation for subfoveal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. The influence of initial lesion size and initial visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:480–488.
14. Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Hawkins BS, Marsh MJ, Sternberg P Jr, Thomas MA; Submacular Surgery Trials Pilot Study Investigators. Submacular surgery trials randomized pilot trial of laser photocoagulation versus surgery for recurrent choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: I. Ophthalmic outcomes submacular surgery trials pilot study report number 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):387-407.
15. Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Miskala PH, et al; Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) Research Group. Surgery for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 11. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(11):1967-1980.
Age-related macular degeneration. The Eye Disease Prevalence Group has estimated that 1.75 million people in the United States have advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD), including neovascular AMD or geographic atrophy, but not necessarily involving the foveal center, with the highest prevalence in adults older than 80 years of age.1 These numbers are estimated to increase substantially in the coming decades.
The numbers are huge, but what impact does AMD have on our patients? AMD is associated with an increased incidence of depression, mortality, and a greater need for assistance for daily tasks. In a quality-oflife study that was part of the Submacular Surgery Trials (SSTs), patients were asked to rate their current vision during phone interviews. Patient scores were converted to a preference value scale ranging from 1 (perfect health with perfect vision) to 0 (death). A mean preference value of 0.64 for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) suggests a profound impact on quality of life. The impact is reported as greatest in those with the most severe loss of vision, but even patients with visual acuity of at least 20/40 in one eye had relatively low preference values.2 This is striking because it is right between having chronic renal failure and symptomatic HIV/AIDS (Figure 1). Clearly, AMD has a significant impact on the quality of life of individuals.
Diabetic retinopathy. It is well known that we are in the midst of an epidemic of obesity and diabetes in the United States. The rates of both have increased dramatically from 1990 to 2001, particularly in the southeast (Figure 2) and the increase in people with diabetes directly correlates to the rise in obesity.3 An estimated 18.2 million people had diabetes in the United States in 20023 and diabetes has been estimated to affect 151 million people worldwide, and is projected to increase to 324 million by 2025.4 It is also estimated that 35% of any diabetic population will have diabetic retinopathy.5 We know this from the Beaver Dam Eye Study. In terms of costs, the direct and indirect costs for diabetes were estimated at $132 billion in 2002.6 Almost $1 out of every $5 in the United States spent on healthcare is for patients with diabetes. Diabetes has an enormous impact on patients’ quality of life and represents a large economic issue.
Retinal vein occlusion. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal disease after diabetic retinopathy. The Beaver Dam Study reported a prevalence of 0.6% in patients older than 43 years and the same study reported a 15-year cumulative incidence of BRVO of 1.8%.7 Although these numbers may sound low, the average age of these patients is 65 and this age group may have a host of comorbidities (eg, hypertension, vascular disease, diabetes). RVOs share risk factors with myocardial infarction (MI),8 stroke, and other arterial thrombotic events.9 In a study that is currently in press,10 we reviewed the records of 4,500 patients with RVO and compared them with 13,500 patients who were age-matched controls. We found that patients with RVO had significantly higher likelihood of having angina, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, diabetes, heart disease, MI or stroke, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension (P=.001) The incidence of RVOs continues to increase as the incidence of diabetes increases and the population ages.
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
Evidence-based medicine is the practice of medicine based on the best scientific data available. The questions are, “How much evidence do you need?” and “How much science is behind it?”
These are the various levels of evidence. The weakest is the single-case report, which is level 5 evidence. The second weakest is the case series without a comparison group (level 4). Level 3 evidence consists of nonrandomized clinical trials that may compare two groups that are not concurrent or randomized. A level 2 clinical trial is similar to a phase 2 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical trial—it is randomized and controlled but it has a high type-1 error, where a trend is apparent and may be significant, but the number of patients is insufficient. A type-2 error is when a treatment difference likely exists but, again, there are not enough patients to isolate the difference.
Level 1 evidence is from randomized, prospective, controlled trials, with a low type-1 and type-2 errors. These are the phase 3 clinical trials that eventually lead to drug approval by the FDA. The key to level 1 evidence is a well-designed study and a large number of patients.
CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN: WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?
In medicine we prefer level 1 trials because of random assignment to treatment or control; the concurrent enrollment that ensures patients are being treated in a similar manner; the large numbers of patients; and the masking of the investigators. The standardized follow up is also important to the significance of outcomes. By controlling these variables, we are able to clinically treat patients in the most scientific manner. My colleague Kuldev Singh, MD, who is a glaucoma specialist has said, “This term [randomized, controlled] allows the investigator to disarm the novice scientific critic, while impugning lesser prospective and all retrospective studies, not to mention case series and reports.” The randomized, controlled study is at the top of the food chain.
A case example of using low-level evidence-based medicine upon which to base treatment decisions is that of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) for treating AMD. In August 2005, there was one case report (level 5 evidence) demonstrating improvement on optical coherence tomography (OCT) for a patient nonresponsive to pegaptanib sodium (Macugen, Eyetech/Pfizer) for AMD in the published literature.11 Simultaneously, Philip Rosenfeld, MD, PhD, one of the authors of the aforementioned case report, presented a paper (level 4 evidence) at the American Society of Retina Specialists in Montreal on a series of patients with exudative AMD who benefited from intravitreal bevacizumab. Clearly, the “bevacizumab for AMD” era was ushered in using the least convincing type of evidence.
Unlike bevacizumab, ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) was subject to two phase 3 randomized, controlled clinical trials sponsored by industry (MARINA ANCHOR) that resulted in FDA approval. The extent to which the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab has been scrutinized is to the highest level.
But can you have a randomized, controlled trial for every disease and treatment? Paul Lichter, MD, said, “Authors of case reports, retrospective studies, and other manuscripts covering the gamut of imperfect clinical projects often conclude their papers by calling for a randomized, controlled, collaborative clinical trial. While I have no idea how many times such statements are made, there is no question that these pronouncements are abundantly more frequent then the clinical trials that result from them.”
CRITERIA FOR CONDUCTING A LEVEL 1 CLINICAL TRIAL
Clearly, a level 1 clinical trial cannot be conducted for every clinical situation. My four criteria for conducting a randomized, controlled clinical trial include the following:
* The disease must represent a significant health problem. An example of what can be called an questionable effort is in 1993 when the Canadian Ophthalmology Study Group conducted a multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the argon green vs krypton red laser for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in AMD.12 The comparison of these lasers was not a burning issue for the health care system.
* There must be scientific plausibility of benefit. In other words, there has to be some biologic basis for believing that a treatment works. An example from the AMD literature is subfoveal laser for CNV.13 There was no basis to suggest that applying laser to a patient’s fovea would be beneficial.
* A plausible, biologic benefit must exist. In other words, the early data on a new treatment should suggest the possibility of benefit. A good example of this is the Submacular Surgery Trials in AMD where early pilot data did not show any benefit to submacular surgery over laser photocoagulation.14 The eventual the long-term data supported this conclusion.
* Sufficient numbers of patients must be enrolled. If a study cannot recruit enough patients, it will not succeed. For example, it was almost impossible to recruit patients into the Macular Translocation clinical trial because they were randomized to either photodynamic therapy—a relatively painless 15-minute office-based laser procedure— or to macular translocation, which had a 25% complication rate at the time they were trying to enroll.15
The clinical trials’ registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov, currently lists 530 clinical trials for the treatment of AMD. Of those 200 trials are open and actively recruiting patients. Eighty-seven of these are randomized and controlled. Those of us in the field of ophthalmology and the subspecialty of retina are fortunate to be part of a profession that is committed to providing the best scientific evidence for its members. We have a long, proud history of practicing evidence-based medicine and performing randomized clinical trials in our field.
NON-INFERIOR CLINICAL TRIALS
There are basically three types of trial design: superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority. The Comparisons of Age- Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) is a non-inferiority trial comparing intravitreal ranibizumab to intravitreal bevacizumab. The margin of non-inferiority must be pre-specified in the design protocol to construct a two-sided, 95% confidence interval (CI) to determine the true difference between the agents. To be able to declare bevacizumab non-inferior, that interval must lay entirely on the positive side of the non-inferior margin.
Figure 3 helps illustrate how the results of a non-inferiority trial are interpreted. Applied to the CATT, if proved non-inferior, bevacizumab is either almost as good as, equivalent to, or better than ranibizumab. If bevacizumab fails non-inferiority then it is either equivalent, almost as good as, or inferior to ranibizumab. All of those possibilities exist.
The major criteria for non-inferiority clinical trials are:
1) historical evidence that the reference drug works (ie, MARINA and ANCHOR);
2) trial design must be the same as the reference trial (ie, the CATT has same design as MARINA and ANCHOR);
3) trial conduct must be the same (ie, many of the clinical sites from MARINA and ANCHOR are also sites for the CATT);
4) the non-inferior margin (minus delta) must be acceptable (ie, six letters for the CATT).
In addition to the CATT, there are two other non-inferiority trials in AMD: HARBOR (A Study of Ranibizumab Administered Monthly or on an As-Needed Basis in Patients With Subfoveal Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration) and VIEW I (VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD). These are both similar to MARINA and ANCHOR in historical evidence, trial design and trial conduct, and have an acceptable non-inferior margin.
SUMMARY
The best way to practice evidence-based medicine is with phase 3, randomized, and controlled trials. The requirements for level 1 clinical trials do not necessarily constitute a “cookbook” for successful trials; rather, they provide guidelines for those who are designing and participating in clinical trials.
Finally, evidence alone is never sufficient information to make a clinical decision—there are many factors to be taken under consideration. When treating our patients, we consider several factors including a patient’s values, socio-economic status, and age; however we should rely on three main components: our years of clinical experience, the patient’s particular circumstances, and what we have learned from evidence-based medicine.
1. Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Muñoz B, et al; The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2004;122:564-572.
2. No authors listed. Submacular surgery trials randomized pilot trial of laser photocoagulation versus surgery for recurrent choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: II. Quality of life outcomes submacular surgery trials pilot study report number 2. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):408-418.
3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States. Bethesda, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2003.
4. King H, Rewers M. Global estimates for prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in adults: WHO Ad Hoc Diabetes Reporting Group. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:157–177.
5. Beaver Dam Eye Study.
6. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917-932.
7. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Linton KL. Beaver Dam Eye Study. Retinopathy in adults with newly discovered and previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(1):58-62.
8. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Heart attack. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/Diseases/HeartAttack/HeartAttack_WhatIs.html.
9. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Committee. Circulation. 2006;113:85-151.
10. Holekamp N. Arch Ophthalmol. In press.
11. Rosenfeld PJ, Moshfeghi AA, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36(4):331-335.
12. The Canadian Ophthalmology Study Group. Argon green vs krypton red laser photocoagulation of extrafoveal choroidal neovascular lesions. One-year results in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:181-185.
13. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Visual outcome after laser photo- coagulation for subfoveal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. The influence of initial lesion size and initial visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:480–488.
14. Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Hawkins BS, Marsh MJ, Sternberg P Jr, Thomas MA; Submacular Surgery Trials Pilot Study Investigators. Submacular surgery trials randomized pilot trial of laser photocoagulation versus surgery for recurrent choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: I. Ophthalmic outcomes submacular surgery trials pilot study report number 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):387-407.
15. Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Miskala PH, et al; Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) Research Group. Surgery for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 11. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(11):1967-1980.
Monday, August 9, 2010
Retinitis pigmentosa treatment
As human beings, there is very little more universally feared than the dark, and few disabilities more frightening than blindness which would leave us trapped in it. Retinitis pigmentosa is a condition which, to many people, might sound like a nightmare. Retinitis pigmentosa refers to a group of genetic conditions in which the eye progressively degenerates over time. The first symptoms of retinitis pigmentosa are night blindness. This night blindness worsens over time, eventually developing into tunnel vision which little by little narrows the sufferer’s peripheral vision until finally they become legally – and perhaps totally – blind.
Progression is different in each case of retinitis pigmentosa. The night blindness phase of the disease can proceed tunnel vision by years or even decades, and many people with retinitis pigmentosa do not legally go blind until their forties or fifties. Some never retain some level of vision throughout their lives. At the same time, others may go blind as early as during childhood.
Retinitis pigmentosa diagnosis come as a fearful shock to some people, which is why retinitis pigmentosa treatments are so important.
Since time out of mind, people have struggled to treat the diseases around them. They have relied on everything from superstition, prayer, spells and religious chants to herbal remedies, surgeries and medicines, some of which are still in use today. Unfortunately for people before the modern era, there was very little to be done for loss of sight. Our ancestors had very few options in terms of treatment for retinitis pigmentosa. Retinitis pigmentosa is caused by abnormalities in the receptors in the eye, the rods and cones which allow us to see color, light and movement. As these abnormalities increase over time, the sufferer’s eyesight diminishes. There was very little for even our grandfathers and grandmothers to do when faced with this sort of disease. It has only been recently that our understanding of how the eye works, our understanding of how the body as a whole operates, and our technology has reached a point where retinitis pigmentosa treatments have become something of a reality and moved out of the realms of witchcraft and hope.
Retinitis pigmentosa treatments are still relatively few. There is no true cure for retinitis pigmentosa, only treatments which may help to slow the progression of this degenerative disease.
Among the first treatment options for people diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa are medications and supplements. For example, vitamin A therapies can support eye health and slow the progression of this disease. People who receive these should have their liver enzymes checked annually, since in too great of doses, vitamin A can become toxic to the system. Other retinitis pigmentosa treatment options include omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and antioxidant, docosahexaenoic acid, acetazolamide, lutein, and calcium blockers.
In the event that medication proves an ineffective retinitis pigmentosa treatment, there are also surgical treatments to consider. What kind of surgical options a patient may have for their retinitis pigmentosa treatment depends on many factors, as the progression of the disease varies greatly from person to person, and as the disease is associated with a number of other genetic and structural conditions. For some people, partial retinal transplants can be a useful retinitis pigmentosa treatment. The possibility of a retinal prosthetics
have also been under consideration for several years now. While there are currently no prosthetics available for clinical use as retinitis pigmentosa treatment, they may present a promising future for those with this degenerative disease.
Since retinitis pigmentosa is a genetic disorder, it should not be surprising that when considering retinitis pigmentosa treatments, speculation might turn to the possibilities of gene therapy and stem cell research. These treatments are, as yet, still in the research and investigation phases, but may well represent the future of retinitis pigmentosa treatment.
Progression is different in each case of retinitis pigmentosa. The night blindness phase of the disease can proceed tunnel vision by years or even decades, and many people with retinitis pigmentosa do not legally go blind until their forties or fifties. Some never retain some level of vision throughout their lives. At the same time, others may go blind as early as during childhood.
Retinitis pigmentosa diagnosis come as a fearful shock to some people, which is why retinitis pigmentosa treatments are so important.
Since time out of mind, people have struggled to treat the diseases around them. They have relied on everything from superstition, prayer, spells and religious chants to herbal remedies, surgeries and medicines, some of which are still in use today. Unfortunately for people before the modern era, there was very little to be done for loss of sight. Our ancestors had very few options in terms of treatment for retinitis pigmentosa. Retinitis pigmentosa is caused by abnormalities in the receptors in the eye, the rods and cones which allow us to see color, light and movement. As these abnormalities increase over time, the sufferer’s eyesight diminishes. There was very little for even our grandfathers and grandmothers to do when faced with this sort of disease. It has only been recently that our understanding of how the eye works, our understanding of how the body as a whole operates, and our technology has reached a point where retinitis pigmentosa treatments have become something of a reality and moved out of the realms of witchcraft and hope.
Retinitis pigmentosa treatments are still relatively few. There is no true cure for retinitis pigmentosa, only treatments which may help to slow the progression of this degenerative disease.
Among the first treatment options for people diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa are medications and supplements. For example, vitamin A therapies can support eye health and slow the progression of this disease. People who receive these should have their liver enzymes checked annually, since in too great of doses, vitamin A can become toxic to the system. Other retinitis pigmentosa treatment options include omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and antioxidant, docosahexaenoic acid, acetazolamide, lutein, and calcium blockers.
In the event that medication proves an ineffective retinitis pigmentosa treatment, there are also surgical treatments to consider. What kind of surgical options a patient may have for their retinitis pigmentosa treatment depends on many factors, as the progression of the disease varies greatly from person to person, and as the disease is associated with a number of other genetic and structural conditions. For some people, partial retinal transplants can be a useful retinitis pigmentosa treatment. The possibility of a retinal prosthetics
have also been under consideration for several years now. While there are currently no prosthetics available for clinical use as retinitis pigmentosa treatment, they may present a promising future for those with this degenerative disease.
Since retinitis pigmentosa is a genetic disorder, it should not be surprising that when considering retinitis pigmentosa treatments, speculation might turn to the possibilities of gene therapy and stem cell research. These treatments are, as yet, still in the research and investigation phases, but may well represent the future of retinitis pigmentosa treatment.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Treatment for Cataracts/ other eye diseases
What is a cataract?
There is only one known treatment for cataracts - surgery! A cataract needs to be removed only when vision loss interferes with your everyday activities, or the things you like to do such as driving, reading, sewing, playing golf or watching TV . You and your eye care professional can make this decision together. Once you understand the benefits and risks of surgery, you can make an informed decision about whether cataract surgery is right for you. In most cases, delaying cataract surgery will not cause long-term damage to your eye or make the surgery more difficult. You do not have to rush into surgery.
Additionally, Medicare and most commercial insurance carriers require that best corrected vision be reduced to some level (often 20/50 visual acuity) before they will approve the surgery for payment.
Sometimes a cataract should be removed even if it does not cause problems with your vision. For example, a cataract should be removed if it prevents examination or treatment of another eye problem, such as age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy.
If you choose surgery, your optometrist will refer you to an ophthalmic surgeon to remove the cataract. This is a very definite advantage over choosing an eye surgeon out of the phone book or from your friends because your doctor knows firsthand the quality of the cataract surgery performed by local eye surgeons. Because they work with the eye surgeons and usually perform some or all of the post-op care they truly know where to refer you for the best possible outcome. If you have cataracts in both eyes that require surgery, the surgery will be performed on each eye at separate times, usually four to eight weeks apart.
As with any surgery, cataract surgery poses risks, such as infection and bleeding. Before cataract surgery, your doctor may ask you to temporarily stop taking certain medications that increase the risk of bleeding during surgery. After surgery, you must keep your eye clean, wash your hands before touching your eye, and use the prescribed medications to help minimize the risk of infection. Serious infection can result in loss of vision. Talk to your eye care professional about these risks. Make sure cataract surgery is right for you.
Cataract surgery slightly increases your risk of retinal detachment. Other eye disorders, such as high myopia (nearsightedness), can further increase your risk of retinal detachment after cataract surgery. One sign of a retinal detachment is a sudden increase in flashes or floaters. Floaters are little "cobwebs" or specks that seem to float about in your field of vision. If you notice a sudden increase in floaters or flashes, see an eye care professional immediately. A retinal detachment is a medical emergency. If necessary, go to an emergency service or hospital. Your eye should be examined by a retinal specialist as soon as possible. A retinal detachment causes no pain. Early treatment for retinal detachment often can prevent permanent loss of vision. The longer the retina stays detached, the less likely you will regain good vision once you are treated. Even if you are treated promptly, some vision may be lost.
There is only one known treatment for cataracts - surgery! A cataract needs to be removed only when vision loss interferes with your everyday activities, or the things you like to do such as driving, reading, sewing, playing golf or watching TV . You and your eye care professional can make this decision together. Once you understand the benefits and risks of surgery, you can make an informed decision about whether cataract surgery is right for you. In most cases, delaying cataract surgery will not cause long-term damage to your eye or make the surgery more difficult. You do not have to rush into surgery.
Additionally, Medicare and most commercial insurance carriers require that best corrected vision be reduced to some level (often 20/50 visual acuity) before they will approve the surgery for payment.
Sometimes a cataract should be removed even if it does not cause problems with your vision. For example, a cataract should be removed if it prevents examination or treatment of another eye problem, such as age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy.
If you choose surgery, your optometrist will refer you to an ophthalmic surgeon to remove the cataract. This is a very definite advantage over choosing an eye surgeon out of the phone book or from your friends because your doctor knows firsthand the quality of the cataract surgery performed by local eye surgeons. Because they work with the eye surgeons and usually perform some or all of the post-op care they truly know where to refer you for the best possible outcome. If you have cataracts in both eyes that require surgery, the surgery will be performed on each eye at separate times, usually four to eight weeks apart.
As with any surgery, cataract surgery poses risks, such as infection and bleeding. Before cataract surgery, your doctor may ask you to temporarily stop taking certain medications that increase the risk of bleeding during surgery. After surgery, you must keep your eye clean, wash your hands before touching your eye, and use the prescribed medications to help minimize the risk of infection. Serious infection can result in loss of vision. Talk to your eye care professional about these risks. Make sure cataract surgery is right for you.
Cataract surgery slightly increases your risk of retinal detachment. Other eye disorders, such as high myopia (nearsightedness), can further increase your risk of retinal detachment after cataract surgery. One sign of a retinal detachment is a sudden increase in flashes or floaters. Floaters are little "cobwebs" or specks that seem to float about in your field of vision. If you notice a sudden increase in floaters or flashes, see an eye care professional immediately. A retinal detachment is a medical emergency. If necessary, go to an emergency service or hospital. Your eye should be examined by a retinal specialist as soon as possible. A retinal detachment causes no pain. Early treatment for retinal detachment often can prevent permanent loss of vision. The longer the retina stays detached, the less likely you will regain good vision once you are treated. Even if you are treated promptly, some vision may be lost.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
